Balancing Acid-Base Reactions with Acetic Acid and Ethylene Diamine

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jeann25
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Reaction
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the acid-base reaction between acetic acid (C2H4O2) and ethylene diamine (C2H8N2), leading to the formation of a salt. Participants explore the balanced chemical equation, noting that both amine groups in ethylene diamine can accept protons. There is uncertainty about the correct product formulation, with suggestions of ionization resulting in C2H3O2- and C2H9N2+. The conversation highlights the complexity of the reaction, emphasizing that acetic acid is a weak acid and ethylene diamine a weak base, necessitating consideration of acid-base equilibria for accurate solution characterization. Overall, the interaction results in the formation of a salt, but precise details depend on the equilibrium states of the reactants.
Jeann25
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Consider the Acid-Base reaction of acetic acid (C2H4O2) with ethylene diamine (C2H8N2) to form the corresponding salt. Then the structural formulas for acetic acid and ethylene diamine were drawn below this.
Write a balanced chemical equation for the reaction, noting both amine groups can accept a proton.

I know that acid + base = water + salt

I'm not sure if what I've come up with is right or not... I don't remember the teacher ever going over anything like this...

C2H4O2 + C2H8N2 --> 2H2O + C4H8N2
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No water in products, amine groups get protonated.
 
Would the product be C2H3O2- + C2H9N2+.. and would this ionize and form a salt?
 
Diamine can get protonated twice.

Basically you will have a salt C2H10N2(2+)(2C2H3O2(-))2.

However, that's not whole truth - acetic acid is a weak acid, ethylene diamine is a weak base, so if you will need precise information about the solution, you will have to take all acid/base equilibria into accounts.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top