What is the Ka for C3H6O3 in a titration with NaOH?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the acid dissociation constant (Ka) for the monoprotic acid C3H6O3 during a titration with NaOH. The equivalence point was reached at a pH of 8 after adding 15.75 cm³ of 0.05 M NaOH to 10 cm³ of the acid solution. Participants noted the challenge of determining the concentrations of H+ and the conjugate base C3H5O3- at equilibrium, emphasizing the importance of understanding the relationship between the concentrations at the equivalence point. There were concerns about the accuracy of using pH 8 for calculations, as this point can lead to significant fluctuations in pH. The thread concluded with frustrations over the lack of resolution and clarity in the original question, indicating a need for better formulation in similar academic inquiries.
cloveryeah
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


when 10 cm3 of a monoprotic acid C3H6O3, with concentration of 7.2g/dm3, was titrated against against 0.05M NaCl, the equivalence point reached when 15.75cm3 (ph8) of NaOH was used.
Calculate the acid dissociation constant Ka for C3H6O3.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

[/B]
when it dissociate, C3H5O3- formed, but i don't know the concentration of H+ and C3H5O3- when it is in equilibrium, so how can i cal. Ka?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
cloveryeah said:

Homework Statement


when 10 cm3 of a monoprotic acid C3H6O3, with concentration of 7.2g/dm3, was titrated against against 0.05M NaCl, the equivalence point reached when 15.75cm3 (ph8) of NaOH was used.
Calculate the acid dissociation constant Ka for C3H6O3.

Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution

[/B]
when it dissociate, C3H5O3- formed, but i don't know the concentration of H+ and C3H5O3- when it is in equilibrium, so how can i cal. Ka?

You have three bits of information here with which to figure this out:

(1) 10 cm^3 of 7.2 g/dm^3 of monoprotic acid
(2) Equivalence point is reached with addition of 15.73 cm^3 of 0,05 M NaOH (typo above) ==> moles OH- = moles C3H6O3
(3) pH at equiv. point is "8" [The pH in the problem statement must refer to the pH of the equivalence point. 0.05 M NaOH does not have pH = 8 ]

So, you have at the end, a solution of the conj. base of your acid. From the pH of this solution, you can find Kb, and from this you can find Ka of the cong. acid.
 
cloveryeah said:
1.

The Attempt at a Solution

[/B]
when it dissociate, C3H5O3- formed, but i don't know the concentration of H+ and C3H5O3- when it is in equilibrium, so how can i cal. Ka?

I agree the question sounds garbled. However at pH 8 you do know the concentration of H+. The concentration of C3H6O3- is for all practical purposes equal to that of Na+ and this is an important principle that will come up in all such calculations, surely explained in your textbook, that you will need to mentally fix.

o_O If the question feels to any student weird and uncomfortable they may not be wrong as the equivalence point is a stupid place to determine a pK - the pH is changing wildly there with added base, so extremely (unnecessary!) good accuracy is being presumed here.

As this all sounded screwy I calculated (check my calcs.) using accurate atomic masses that 0.7993 mMoles acid were initially present, and 0.7875 mMoles of Na+ which is given to 4 figures, added. And is 1.5% short of equivalence. Just about makes sense. :bugeye:

Actually that last figure tells me that the pK should be in the ballpark of a bit above 6.

And then again with the given formula there are not many options for a structure with acid group and I do not know any hydroxyacid with pK in that ballpark. :wideeyed:
 
Last edited:
I see cloveryeah has returned to the forum. He is in my black book, see my sig., unless the question here gets resolved.
Perhaps he misquoted the question, at any rate there seem to be several anomalies in it as I have laid out.
By now he must have had an answer or clarification in the form of marked homework, class discussion or something, but the thread is abandoned.
I have thought and worked more on it than a student would have if this had been a proper question. It feels like wasted time.

I've tried helping in a few too many similar timewasting unconcluded threads like this here, and with this one I finally lost patience. :mad:
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top