Add, subtract, multiply and divide uncertainties in measurement.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on how to handle uncertainties in measurement, specifically in the context of adding, subtracting, multiplying, and dividing these uncertainties. Participants seek clarification on whether the question pertains to estimating errors in a function based on given measurement errors. Examples of measurement errors provided include 0.06 ± 5% and 0.09 ± 3%. It is noted that for uncorrelated variables, the covariances and correlation factors are zero. Understanding the propagation of uncertainty is essential for accurate calculations in measurements.
Sassenav22
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Can someone show me how to add, subtract, multiply and divide uncertainties in measurement.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org


I'm not sure I understand your question. Do you mean something like given errors in measuring a and b estimate the error in calculating some function f(a,b)? Or something else?
 


errors in measurement like 0.06 plus and minus 5% and 0.09 plus and minus 3%
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top