Adding a Transistor to Fade LED

  • Thread starter Thread starter thshen34
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Led Transistor
AI Thread Summary
Adding a transistor between the LED and the driver to PWM and fade the LED with 0-5V logic may not work effectively due to potential confusion in the DC-DC module's feedback control loop. A more viable solution is to create a custom boost-buck (SEPIC) DC-DC circuit that incorporates dimming capability directly. PWM constant current drivers, such as the CAT4101, are suggested alternatives for achieving the desired effect. Caution is advised regarding the application note warning that the LED must always be connected when power is applied, as interrupting the LED current could lead to issues. Overall, without a thorough understanding of the internal design of the driver, attempting modifications may not be advisable.
thshen34
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Would it be possible to add a transistor in between the LED and the driver, as shown in the application photos, to PWM and fade the LED with 0-5V logic (Assume the LED has a forward voltage of 3V)?

http://www.superbrightleds.com/moreinfo/component-led-accessories/led-driver-micropuck-dc-buck-boost-constant-current/1053/
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
thshen34 said:
Would it be possible to add a transistor in between the LED and the driver, as shown in the application photos, to PWM and fade the LED with 0-5V logic (Assume the LED has a forward voltage of 3V)?

http://www.superbrightleds.com/moreinfo/component-led-accessories/led-driver-micropuck-dc-buck-boost-constant-current/1053/

I would think probably not, at least not the PWM part. That DC-DC module's feedback control loop would likely be confused by any pulsing of the load impedance.

A better solution would be to make your own boost-buck (SEPIC) DC-DC circuit, and include the dimming capability in the circuit itself.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
It's just an 8V buck/boost switching supply. You could probably PWM it just like you could for any switcher supplying LED's. If the switcher design is really crappy you may need to add a large output capacitor. I'd say give it a go.

I don't see where, in the app photo's, there is a transistor so I can't comment on a PWM circuit. There are PWM constant current drivers available like CAT4101.
 
thshen34 said:
Would it be possible to add a transistor in between the LED and the driver, as shown in the application photos, to PWM and fade the LED with 0-5V logic (Assume the LED has a forward voltage of 3V)?

http://www.superbrightleds.com/moreinfo/component-led-accessories/led-driver-micropuck-dc-buck-boost-constant-current/1053/
The application sheet carries a note alongside the boost driver configuration (and also the buck/boost configuration): "LED must always be connected whenever power is applied![/color]" I would be cautious about interrupting the LED current as it seems to be flying in the face of that warning. (But then again, nothing ventured, nothing gained. :smile:)

Perhaps you could, instead, switch a lower-voltage diode string in parallel with the LED to rob it of drive? If the puk's output is floating, a BJT switch may be tricky, though.

The drive is loosely pitched at a few hundred mA, while varying according to the supply voltage, is that how it works? It sounds like a limited niche module.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I didn't open theapplications notes. Based on the applications note I'd say this is not a basic switcher. It is, as NO stated, a "limited niche driver". I was wrong. I don't think you should try without details of the internal design.
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top