Adding more than two coherent sound sources of different phases

AI Thread Summary
To add more than two coherent sound sources with different phases, identify each path's length in wavelengths to calculate phase differences, applying the principle of superposition for wave addition. The discussion highlights the importance of considering the instantaneous amplitude of each signal, factoring in the speed of sound in the environment. When multiple paths converge at a barrier, it’s debated whether to treat them as separate until they reach the receiver or to combine them at the barrier. An example is provided involving three coherent sources with different power outputs and distances, suggesting the use of a specific equation to calculate the resultant sound pressure. Understanding these principles can enhance the analysis of sound propagation in complex environments.
pitchtwit
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Does anyone know how to add more than two coherent sources that have different phases?

An example might be a sound source and a receiver with sound reaching the receiver directly and by two reflections via different paths - maybe off a hard floor and hard ceiling.

There's a good document on adding two coherent sources here - http://35.9.69.219/home/modules/pdf_modules/m205.pdf, but I can't find much on adding more than two.

Any help would be great,

Tom
 
Physics news on Phys.org
My first suggestion would be to identify each path and determine its length in wavelengths.
This can be converted to phase differences and the waves (however many) add using the principle of superposition.
In optics a diffraction grating can be analysed in this way expanding from 2 sources to 3 sources to 4 sources and so on.
Not much specific help but I hope it triggers something for you.
The document you quoted is very good.
 
Consider the instantaneous amplitude of each signal at the receiver to be equal to its peak amplitude multiplied by the Sin of its angular frequency multiplied by the time of travel (with the speed of sound in that environment taken into account).



Add them all together.
 
Thanks for that. I'm just wondering about something that's related. If a source radiates omnidirectionally at a certain height above a acoustically reflective surface, and there's a barrier in between the source and receiver, then on the source side there would be two signal paths - both of which end up at the top of the barrier - at the same point. These two paths can be considered as two separate coherent sound sources, but at the top of the barrier would they join together to form one sound path? Or is it best to consider all the sound paths as separate right until they meet the receiver - so not confusing anything too much?
 
I'm still having no success with this really.

Imagine if there were three coherent sources radiating omnidirectionally at the same frequency. Two of the sources had an acoustic power output of 1 W and were 1 wavelength away from the receiver. Then the third source had an acoustic power output of 6 W but was half a wavelength away.

Would I just use this equation?: -
p^2=p1^2+p2^2+p3^2+2*p1*p2*cos(B1-B2-B3),

where p values are calculated from Lp = Lw - 10*log(4*pi*r^2) and B values are the phase values of each source at the receiver and are calculated using k*r.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top