Adding SNR from multiple detectors

AI Thread Summary
When using two detectors with an SNR of 2 each, the overall SNR can improve if the signals are correlated and the noise is uncorrelated. The combined SNR is not simply additive; instead, it follows the root-sum-square method, resulting in an SNR of 2 times the square root of 2. This means that the fusion of the two detectors can enhance detection probability significantly. Understanding the correlation of signals and the nature of noise is crucial for accurate SNR calculations. Properly fusing data from multiple detectors can lead to better detection outcomes.
sparkle_pony
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
I am looking at the same object with two detectors. The SNR on each is 2, which is a low probability of detect given a single sensor. However, if I fuse the two what would be the SNR then? Would it be additive (SNR=4) or rss (SNR=2×sqrt(2)) or something more complicated?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Correlated signals add, uncorrelated signals are sqrt(sum of squares).

If the noise is uncorrelated between the detectors, and the signal is correlated, you will improve the SNR
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top