Addition of orbital angular momentum and spin

gu1t4r5
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider an electron with spin \frac{1}{2} and orbital angular momentum l=1. Write down all possible total angular momentum states as a combination of the product states | l=1 , m_l > | s = \frac{1}{2} , m_s >

Homework Equations



Lowering operator : J_- |j, m> = \sqrt{(j + m)(j - m + 1)} |j, m-1>

The Attempt at a Solution



Since total angular momentum | l-s | <= j <= (l+s)
and its z-component -j <= m_j <= +j
I know that the possible |j, m_j > states are:

| \frac{1}{2} , \frac{-1}{2} >
| \frac{1}{2} , \frac{1}{2} >
| \frac{3}{2} , \frac{-3}{2} >
| \frac{3}{2} , \frac{-1}{2} >
| \frac{3}{2} , \frac{1}{2} >
| \frac{3}{2} , \frac{3}{2} >

As for finding the product states, I know that:
| \frac{3}{2} , \frac{3}{2} > = |1, 1> | \frac{1}{2} , \frac{1}{2} >
as this is the maximal spin state. I can then find | \frac{3}{2} , \frac{1}{2} >, | \frac{3}{2} , \frac{-1}{2} > and | \frac{3}{2} , \frac{-3}{2} > using the lowering operator above. I don't know how I can use this information to find | \frac{1}{2} , \frac{1}{2} > and | \frac{1}{2} , \frac{-1}{2} > however.


Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well the j=1/2 states are the ones that had m_l = 0. As for the actual problem it seems to me like they want you to write out all of the states you listed in terms of the clebsch-gordon coefficients times the uncoupled basis states.
 
gu1t4r5 said:

Homework Statement



Consider an electron with spin \frac{1}{2} and orbital angular momentum l=1. Write down all possible total angular momentum states as a combination of the product states | l=1 , m_l > | s = \frac{1}{2} , m_s >

Homework Equations



Lowering operator : J_- |j, m> = \sqrt{(j + m)(j - m + 1)} |j, m-1>

The Attempt at a Solution



Since total angular momentum | l-s | <= j <= (l+s)
and its z-component -j <= m_j <= +j
I know that the possible |j, m_j > states are:

| \frac{1}{2} , \frac{-1}{2} >
| \frac{1}{2} , \frac{1}{2} >
| \frac{3}{2} , \frac{-3}{2} >
| \frac{3}{2} , \frac{-1}{2} >
| \frac{3}{2} , \frac{1}{2} >
| \frac{3}{2} , \frac{3}{2} >

As for finding the product states, I know that:
| \frac{3}{2} , \frac{3}{2} > = |1, 1> | \frac{1}{2} , \frac{1}{2} >
as this is the maximal spin state. I can then find | \frac{3}{2} , \frac{1}{2} >, | \frac{3}{2} , \frac{-1}{2} > and | \frac{3}{2} , \frac{-3}{2} > using the lowering operator above. I don't know how I can use this information to find | \frac{1}{2} , \frac{1}{2} > and | \frac{1}{2} , \frac{-1}{2} > however.


Thanks.
You want to find ##\lvert \frac{1}{2}, \frac{1}{2} \rangle## so that it's orthogonal to ##\lvert \frac{3}{2}, \frac{1}{2} \rangle##.
 
In the problem statement they do not ask you to calculate the total momentum ##| J, m_j > ##. I think that you just have to write down a linear equation in the states ##|1,m_l> | 1/2, m_s > ## where ##m_l## has three possible values and ##m_s## two.
 
That's what gu1t4r5 has described doing, and he or she explained how to find four of the six linear combinations. The question gu1t4r5 asked was about how to find the last two.
 
Oh, yes, I misunderstood the problem.
And it is a good idea to find the remaining two with the requirement that they are orthogonal to the other.
You could also use pre-calculated clebsch-gordon coefficients as scoobmx says.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top