Addressing Intermittent Over Current Faults in Dual UPS System

  • Thread starter Thread starter jtweedie@atdesk.com
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Static Switches
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a dual UPS system where an overcurrent fault occurs in UPSB when switching from Source1 to Source2 after a failure in UPSA. The intermittent nature of the fault suggests that UPSB may not be adequately sized to handle the combined load during the transfer. It is emphasized that no switching arrangement can resolve this issue if UPSB cannot support both loads. The conclusion is that each UPS must be rated to supply the total load of both systems to prevent overcurrent faults. Proper sizing of the UPS units is crucial for reliable operation in this configuration.
jtweedie@atdesk.com
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I have two UPSs, UPSA & UPSB, and two static transfer switches, STSA & STSB. UPSA feeds Source1 on STSA (preferred) and Source1 on STSB. UPSB feeds Source2 on STSA and Source2 on STSB (preferred). Each UPS has approxiamately a balanced 15KW load. Each UPS has 4 downstream transformers.

Question: IF i fail source1 on UPSA, STSA will will transfer from source1 to source2. BUT UPSB's inverter will fault on over current. The same thing will happen if i fail the preferred source of UPSB. This problem is also intermittent on both UPSs

There is more info but i would like to see what questions are generated so i will hold off. This is the core problem.

Any ideas
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
jtweedie@atdesk.com said:
Question: IF i fail source1 on UPSA, STSA will will transfer from source1 to source2. BUT UPSB's inverter will fault on over current.
This seems to make no sense. If B will trip on over current, then B is not adequately sized to carry both loads. No switching arrangement will cure that. You must have two UPS systems, each rated to supply A+B loads.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top