Adiabatic approximation in the derivation of the speed of sound

In summary: However, in practice the gas is never in thermal equilibrium and the deviations from ideal-hydro are significant.In summary, the speed of sound in a gas is given to be ##v=\sqrt{\frac{\gamma RT}{M}}##, where ##\gamma## is the adiabatic exponent, R is the gas constant and M is the molar mass of the gas. In deriving this expression, we assumed that the compression and expansion processes were so fast that there isn't enough time for heat transfer to take place, and therefore that the processes are approximately adiabatic (Laplace's correction to Newton's formula). We therefore used ##PV^\gamma = constant##. However the
  • #1
Terry Bing
48
6
The speed of sound in a gas at temperature T is given to be ## v=\sqrt{\frac{\gamma RT}{M}}##, where ##\gamma## is the adiabatic exponent, R is the gas constant and M is the molar mass of the gas. In deriving this expression, we assumed that the compression and expansion processes were so fast that there isn't enough time for heat transfer to take place, and therefore that the processes are approximately adiabatic (Laplace's correction to Newton's formula). We therefore used ##PV^\gamma = constant##. However the relation ##PV^\gamma = constant## is valid only for a quasi-static adiabatic process, and cannot be used for very fast processes. The quasi-static assumption is made in the derivation of adiabatic process relations. So how are we allowed to use it in the speed of sound derivation? The very reason we assumed the process was adiabatic is because it is very fast in the first place. So how is it consistent to assume it is quasi-static as well?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The process has to be slow enough that it's quasi-static, but fast enough that negligible heat is transferred.
 
  • #3
Mister T said:
The process has to be slow enough that it's quasi-static, but fast enough that negligible heat is transferred.
How do we know that this case satisfies that condition? Is there a practical limit below which a process can be reasonably assumed to be quasistatic? I have read that we can make the quasistatic approximation for expansion and compression processes, if the boundaries are moving much slower than the speed of sound in the gas. This makes perfect sense because then there would be sufficient time for the boundary disturbance to propagate through the rest of the gas and equalize for each small part of the process. However, I don't see how I can use that here, since the very derivation is for speed of sound in the gas.
 
  • #4
Terry Bing said:
How do we know that this case satisfies that condition?

It's an assumption used in the derivation. If the result of the derivation matches what we observe then that gives us confidence that the assumption is justified.
 
  • Like
Likes Terry Bing
  • #5
FWIW, my text derives the basic relation (##c = \sqrt{\frac{\Delta p}{\Delta \rho}}##) using mass and momentum equations, then justifies the use of the isentropic relation (##\frac{p}{\rho ^k} = const##) by referring to experimental results which "indicate that the relationship between pressure and density across a sound wave is nearly isentropic."

So, rather than being an assumption in the derivation, it is an experimental finding that is applied to the general result.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
  • #6
Mister T said:
It's an assumption used in the derivation. If the result of the derivation matches what we observe then that gives us confidence that the assumption is justified.
Thanks. I get that it matches the observed speed of sound. I am just curious as to why? Was there a way we could have guessed beforehand that it would work?
 
  • #7
You can derive hydrodynamics from the Boltzmann-transport equation. The ideal hydrodynamics equation, the Euler equation of an ideal fluid, comes out when you consider the fluid being always in local thermal equilibrium, i.e., at any time the phase-space distribution function is that of an ideal gas with temperature and chemical potential being functions of time and position. This approximation is valid if the typical changes of these macroscopic quantities are slow in time and with not too large gradients in space. This implies that no heat is transferred and no dissipation occurs, i.e., the thermodynamic process is adiabatic, i.e., entropy doesn't change. That's because the collision term of the Boltzmann equation then vanishes.

On top of this ideal-hydro approximation you can consider deviations from local thermal equilibrium using a gradient expansion or the method of moments. This leads to the calucation of transport coefficients like heat conductivity and shear and bulk viscosity. In the lowest order of the gradient expansion you obtain the Navier-Stokes equation.
 

What is the adiabatic approximation in the derivation of the speed of sound?

The adiabatic approximation is a simplifying assumption used in the derivation of the speed of sound in a gas. It assumes that the process of sound propagation is adiabatic, meaning that there is no heat exchange between the gas and its surroundings.

Why is the adiabatic approximation used in the derivation of the speed of sound?

The adiabatic approximation is used because it simplifies the mathematical equations involved in the derivation of the speed of sound. It allows for a more straightforward calculation of the speed of sound without having to consider the complexities of heat transfer.

How does the adiabatic approximation affect the accuracy of the calculated speed of sound?

The adiabatic approximation does introduce some error into the calculation of the speed of sound, as it does not account for heat transfer. However, this error is typically small and can be neglected in most cases.

What are the limitations of the adiabatic approximation in the derivation of the speed of sound?

The adiabatic approximation is only valid for ideal gases and cannot be applied to real gases, which may experience non-adiabatic processes. It also assumes a constant ratio of specific heats, which may not hold true at high temperatures or pressures.

Are there any alternative methods for calculating the speed of sound that do not use the adiabatic approximation?

Yes, there are other methods for calculating the speed of sound that do not rely on the adiabatic approximation. These methods may take into account factors such as heat transfer, non-ideal gas behavior, and temperature and pressure dependence of the specific heat ratio. However, these methods may be more complex and require more data input.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
531
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
813
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
504
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
946
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
789
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
956
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
702
  • Classical Physics
Replies
1
Views
878
Back
Top