Adiabatic Process and the speed of sound

AI Thread Summary
Newton miscalculated the speed of sound by assuming it was an isothermal process, while it is actually adiabatic, where rapid compression and rarefaction lead to local temperature changes without heat exchange. This results in an increase in pressure during compression, which raises the speed of sound. The correct relationship for the speed of sound incorporates the adiabatic condition, yielding a factor of √γ, where γ is the heat capacity ratio. During the rarefaction phase, cooling decreases pressure, which also affects the rate of change of pressure with density. Understanding these dynamics clarifies why the speed of sound increases in an adiabatic process.
veryownjustin
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

Sorry if this post is a bit wordy but I've been going round in circles and I thought I'd see if anyone on here can help, it's also my first post so be nice...

I've been trying to understand how Newton miscalculated the speed of sound. I know that he thought that the propagation of a sound wave was an isothermal process and he worked out the speed based on air's elasticity and density. I'm also aware that it is actually an adiabatic process. I understand this to the point that there is a local change in temperature due to the compression and rarefaction half - cycles of the waveform and that the these changes occur so quickly that no heat can enter or leave the cycle, hence an adiabatic process. What I don't understand is why this heating and cooling cause the speed of sound to increase? I have a few ideas but I haven't been able to find an explanation anywhere and am beginning to think this because the answer is so obvious it doesn't need saying! Any help with this will be greatly appreciated.

Thanks

Justin
 
Physics news on Phys.org
veryownjustin said:
I understand this to the point that there is a local change in temperature due to the compression and rarefaction half - cycles of the waveform and that the these changes occur so quickly that no heat can enter or leave the cycle, hence an adiabatic process. What I don't understand is why this heating and cooling cause the speed of sound to increase? I have a few ideas but I haven't been able to find an explanation anywhere and am beginning to think this because the answer is so obvious it doesn't need saying! Any help with this will be greatly appreciated.
Newton found that the speed was related to the rate of change of pressure with density:

v^2 = \frac{dP}{d\rho}

This was based on Newton's correct analysis of the mechanical forces that are needed to accelerate the medium (which has mass).

If one applies the relationship between pressure and volume at constant temperature: PV=constant = nRT. So:

P = \frac{n}{V}RT

Since \rho = nM/V where M = molecular weight of the gas, P = MRT\rho

\frac{dP}{d\rho} = MRT

so v^2 = MRTWhat Newton did not take into account was the fact that when a gas is compressed (adiabatically), its temperature also increases. This increase in temperature makes the pressure higher. So the rate of pressure with density is higher when one takes into account this increase in temperature. Applying the adiabatic condition:

PV^\gamma = \text{constant}

If you work out the rate of change of P with density (mass/V = nM/V) you get:

\frac{dP}{d\rho} = \gamma MRT

so v = \sqrt{\gamma MRT}

For air, \gamma = 1.4 so the difference is a factor of \sqrt{1.4} = 1.18

AM
 
Last edited:
Andrew Mason said:
Since \rho = nM/V where M = molecular weight of the gas, P = MRT\rho

\frac{dP}{d\rho} = MRT

so v^2 = MRT
I made a sloppy error in this post and then discovered it was too late to correct it so I will post this correction. The RT term must be divided by M (molecular wt in Kg/mol):

Since \rho = nM/V, the ideal gas law can be written:

P = \frac{n}{V}RT = \frac{\rho}{M}RT

Differentiating with respect to \rho we get:

\frac{dP}{d\rho} = RT/M

so v^2 = \frac{RT}{M}


Similarly, when correcting for \gamma, it should be

v = \sqrt{\gamma \frac{RT}{M}

Sorry about any confusion.

AM
 
Hi Andrew,

Thanks for responding. Although I can follow the maths I don't really know what a lot of the terms mean, but that's okay as I was just trying to understand why there is a change. But I do now get that if the speed of sound is the rate of change of pressure with density and that as a gas is compressed it increases in temperature, I can see how the rate of change of pressure would also increase and therefore so would the speed of sound. Am I right in saying that during the rarefaction half cycle the cooling of air would decrease the pressure and therefore increase the rate of change of pressure with density?

Thanks

Justin
 
veryownjustin said:
Am I right in saying that during the rarefaction half cycle the cooling of air would decrease the pressure and therefore increase the rate of change of pressure with density?
Yes. If the change in density is negative (expansion), the greater drop in pressure resulting from the temperature decrease makes dP/d\rho greater.

AM
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top