Adiabatic Process: Cv (Molar Heat)

  • Thread starter Thread starter C_Ovidiu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Process
AI Thread Summary
In an adiabatic process involving an ideal gas and a spring, the final volume of the gas doubles while its temperature decreases to 10/11 of its initial value. The discussion highlights a discrepancy when applying the formula T·V^(γ-1)=constant, which is meant for quasi-static processes, suggesting that the spring's initial lack of force disrupts this condition. The conservation of energy equation is emphasized as the appropriate approach for this scenario. Participants question the interpretation of work done by the piston and its relation to calculating γ. The conversation underscores the importance of understanding the conditions under which specific thermodynamic equations are valid.
C_Ovidiu
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
Say we have a cilinder, thermally isolated from the environment, divided in two parts by a piston. In the left part we have an ideal gas, in the right part an unstretched spring. After we set free the piston, in the final phase, we fin that the gas' volume has doubled, while it's temperature is 10/11 the initial temperature. Find Cv (molar heat).

If we consider L=-\Delta U that we find a reasonable result. However, since the process is adibatic(that is why I used equation above) if we try to aply the formula T\cdot V^{\gamma-1}=ct we find a totally different result. Why is that ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since nobody else has responded, I'll take a stab at it.

Using T V γ-1=constant should give the right answer.

Is L supposed to be work done by the piston? How did you use that to calculate γ?

What did you get for γ using the two methods?
 
The formula for adiabatic expansion only applies in quasi-static situations. In your situation, the spring provides no force initially, so it is definitely not quasi-static. Only the conservation of energy equation applies.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top