Adiabatic Process: No Energy Change but Temperature Change?

AI Thread Summary
In an adiabatic process, no heat energy is transferred, resulting in no net energy change, yet pressure, volume, and temperature can still change. The temperature change occurs due to variations in the internal energy of the gas, which is linked to the work done on or by the gas. This distinction between heat and internal energy often leads to confusion in thermodynamics discussions. Clarifying that temperature is a measure of atomic or molecular vibration helps to understand these changes. Ultimately, while heat transfer is absent, the internal energy can still fluctuate due to work interactions.
EIRE2003
Messages
107
Reaction score
0
In an Adiabatic Process no heat energy is trasferred into or out of the system so there is no energy change, BUT, there is a change in pressure, volume and temperature.

But when atoms or molecules gain/loose heat energy they vibrate more/less respectively. And the measure of the vibration of the atoms/molecules is the temperature, am I right? So my question is Why is there no energy change but a temperature change?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
EIRE2003 said:
In an Adiabatic Process no heat energy is trasferred into or out of the system so there is no energy change, BUT, there is a change in pressure, volume and temperature.

But when atoms or molecules gain/loose heat energy they vibrate more/less respectively. And the measure of the vibration of the atoms/molecules is the temperature, am I right? So my question is Why is there no energy change but a temperature change?

Thanks
There is an energy change. It is a change to the internal energy of the gas. The energy change is equal to the amount of work done by or to the gas.

This is an area that causes confusion. Prof. Zemansky would say that you should not talk about heat as distinct from internal energy. This is probably a good idea, but that is not yet the way thermodynamics is taught.

AM
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top