Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

AdS/CFT derived from Kaluza theory

  1. Jan 18, 2013 #1
    Has there been a major breakthrough in AdS/CFT correspondence? The maths are so simple compared to what I normally read on AdS/CFT. Could this be accurate? Accurate or not, this an excellent theoretical exercise in the braneworld.

    https://docs.google.com/file/d/0BxV2HFmw-aNMcEktN3Jhd0d4eW8/edit [Broken]
    Last edited by a moderator: May 6, 2017
  2. jcsd
  3. Jan 23, 2013 #2
    I wish someone could answer to this question...
  4. Jan 23, 2013 #3
    The paper is nonsensical. It is so nonsensical that I don't even want to discuss it, because that will just encourage the author to try to explain it to me.
    Last edited: Jan 23, 2013
  5. Jan 23, 2013 #4
    glad you posted...I didn't understand the math, but that paper seemed REALLY weird!!

    Like, poor introduction and no conclusions??????
  6. Jan 23, 2013 #5
    I agree. I think the scientific community's unified use English for scientific communication has a purpose. When a paper like this appears written in Esperanto using the wingdings dingbat font it can be nothing other than pure nonsense. Who even knows Esperanto or can read the dingbat fonts? The only reason I posted this is because I did understand the math which appears to explain AdS/CFT better than anyone else has.
  7. Jan 23, 2013 #6
    AdS/CFT duality is a highly nontrivial equivalence between two quantum theories. The bulk of this paper talks about purely classical relations like boundary conditions. Quantum mechanics hardly shows up, except for a few token comments.
  8. Jan 23, 2013 #7
    This paper has not been published in a peer-reviewed journal. Therefore, we don't allow it on this forum.

    Thread locked.
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook