Advanced Electromagnetic and Mathematic Concepts

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the simplification of the wave equation for the magnetic vector potential under the Lorentz gauge condition, specifically the omission of the d2A/dt2 term. This omission is justified by the quasistatic approximation, where the displacement current is considered negligible compared to the real current, allowing the equation to be treated as a Poisson Equation. The approximation is valid in scenarios where the system's dimensions are much smaller than the wavelength of electromagnetic waves involved. However, ignoring this term also means disregarding the possibility of electromagnetic wave propagation. Understanding these conditions is crucial for applying the quasistatic approximation effectively.
Michael Lin
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Hi All,

From electromagnetic theories, with the Lorentz gauge condition for the magnetic vector potential, I get the following wave equation:
1/csquared * d2A/dt2 + del2 A= u0 j.
in some literatures, they ignored the d2A/dt2 term and I don't know why they can do that. Is it becasue they assumed some quasi-stationary condition on the E field created by the magnetic field?
This simplication leads to a big simplification in which they can solve it as a Poisson Equation. I just want to know why they can ignore that term.

Thanks,
Micahel
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, it is typically called the quasistatic approximation. You keep the Faraday term \partial B/ \partial t in Maxwell's equations, but drop the Maxwell term \partial E/ \partial t. This is an approximation which is valid in some limited circumstances where the displacement current (Maxwell term) is small compared to the real current. A typical scenario might be a wire loop in a magnetic field and the like.

More properly, by leaving out the Maxwell term you ignore the possibility of electromagnetic waves. To justify this approximation, the frequencies of interest in your system must correspond to electromagnetic waves of wavelength much larger than your system of interest. In other words, everything should be slowly varying or "quasistatic".
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top