I Advancements in Cyclotron Particle Accelerator Design: A Scientist's Perspective

Edzim
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I've been working on modifying the cyclotron particle accelerator. Tell me what you think?
It's pretty basic though
 

Attachments

  • 15504268491712176999357013789149.jpg
    15504268491712176999357013789149.jpg
    28 KB · Views: 389
  • 15504272631956887324321072095563.jpg
    15504272631956887324321072095563.jpg
    16.6 KB · Views: 336
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to the PF. :smile:
Edzim said:
I've been working on modifying the cyclotron particle accelerator. Tell me what you think?
It's pretty basic though
Your pictures are unreadable. Plus, what is wrong with existing cyclotron designs? What aspect would you want to improve?
 
Edzim said:
I've been working on modifying the cyclotron particle accelerator. Tell me what you think?
It's pretty basic though

Physics just doesn't say "what goes up must come down". It must also say where and when it comes down.

Your "modified" cyclotron is nothing more than a drawing. There are people on here that don't just draw such things. They actually are physicists and engineers in accelerator science. So if you want to impress them, then you need to not only understand the physics, but also to show quantitative analysis of what you are doing, especially if you claim to have made a modification to something that is well-known.

And has berkeman has said, what exactly did you do that is different, and why is it important/interesting? What does it do that the old design can't do, or something that can't be done with other existing design or facilities?

Zz.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top