Advantage/disadvantage of notation

  • Thread starter Thread starter grzz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Notation
grzz
Messages
1,030
Reaction score
26
When discussing Lorentz transformations some books use
xμ/ = Λμ/αxα
while some other books use
x'μ= Λμαxα.
Perhaps someone can help me understand which is the better notation.
Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'd say the first notation is better. It tells you that the Lorentz transformation matrix has been constructed using the velocity of the upper index frame relative to the lower index frame. You can't tell the difference just by looking at the Lorentz transformation symbol in the lower equation (without looking at the two sides of the equation).
 
I think it is largely a matter of personal preference. I was introduced to the second notation as an undergraduate, but lately I have started preferring the first.
 
Ok...I been told not too make something to complex here...Go with First one, and make sure, you do the second, has a thesis. And that will help you understand both. If your doing a Underg...make sure you do both sides, because they always ask why that, and why not this.
 
Thanks so much to you all.
It seems that the first method is the better.
As for the post of DarkoDornel, I am happy to say that I do not have to worry about "they always ask why that, and why not this" because I am a retired high school teacher who does not intend to work towards any thesis.
 
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Abstract The gravitational-wave signal GW250114 was observed by the two LIGO detectors with a network matched-filter signal-to-noise ratio of 80. The signal was emitted by the coalescence of two black holes with near-equal masses ## m_1=33.6_{-0.8}^{+1.2} M_{⊙} ## and ## m_2=32.2_{-1. 3}^{+0.8} M_{⊙}##, and small spins ##\chi_{1,2}\leq 0.26 ## (90% credibility) and negligible eccentricity ##e⁢\leq 0.03.## Postmerger data excluding the peak region are consistent with the dominant quadrupolar...
Back
Top