Advantage/disadvantage of notation

  • Thread starter Thread starter grzz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Notation
grzz
Messages
1,030
Reaction score
26
When discussing Lorentz transformations some books use
xμ/ = Λμ/αxα
while some other books use
x'μ= Λμαxα.
Perhaps someone can help me understand which is the better notation.
Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'd say the first notation is better. It tells you that the Lorentz transformation matrix has been constructed using the velocity of the upper index frame relative to the lower index frame. You can't tell the difference just by looking at the Lorentz transformation symbol in the lower equation (without looking at the two sides of the equation).
 
I think it is largely a matter of personal preference. I was introduced to the second notation as an undergraduate, but lately I have started preferring the first.
 
Ok...I been told not too make something to complex here...Go with First one, and make sure, you do the second, has a thesis. And that will help you understand both. If your doing a Underg...make sure you do both sides, because they always ask why that, and why not this.
 
Thanks so much to you all.
It seems that the first method is the better.
As for the post of DarkoDornel, I am happy to say that I do not have to worry about "they always ask why that, and why not this" because I am a retired high school teacher who does not intend to work towards any thesis.
 
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top