Advantage of using a bigger pulley in belt drive?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter hihiip201
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Belt Drive Pulley
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the advantages and implications of using a larger pulley in a belt drive system compared to a smaller pulley. Participants explore the effects on torque, acceleration, and velocity in both scenarios, considering theoretical and practical applications.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a scenario comparing two pulleys of different radii and derives equations for angular acceleration, suggesting that a smaller pulley results in higher angular acceleration for the same torque.
  • Another participant clarifies that with a smaller pulley, while the force available to accelerate the mass is greater, the linear velocity of the belt is lower, likening the situation to changing gears in a car.
  • A question is raised about whether the mass can still be moved quicker with a smaller pulley, despite the higher force, indicating a need for clarity on the terms "moved at a constant velocity" versus "accelerated."
  • One participant notes that in a frictionless system, moving the mass at a constant velocity requires no power, and the maximum velocity is influenced by the motor's angular velocity and the pulley radius.
  • There is a distinction made between scenarios involving constant velocity and those involving acceleration or vertical movement, suggesting different considerations for each case.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of using larger versus smaller pulleys, particularly regarding the relationship between force, velocity, and acceleration. The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing perspectives presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of distinguishing between constant velocity and acceleration, as well as the role of friction in the system, which may affect the outcomes discussed.

hihiip201
Messages
169
Reaction score
0
Hi :

lets examine the following scenario

1.

M --------- o where M is a mass, o is a pulley with it's outter radius r attached to a mass by the belt drive -------. frictionless.


2.

M ---------O same setup but the radius is now bigger, R.



I was reading somewhere saying, a smaller pulley can move things quicker, so i decided to derive this to see for myself.


the following is the result:


for case 1:

alpha = T/(J+Mr^2)

case 2:

alpha = T/(J+MR^2)


in other word, for the same torque generated from DC motor, alpha is higher for case 1.



also, in the case where the pulley rotates at a constant velocity, constant torque output, case 1 amplify the force on the mass M where as the force on the Mass M in case 2 would be lower.



so my question is, why would anyone choose case 2 at all? what advantage does it have on any applications?


thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
also, in the case where the pulley rotates at a constant velocity, constant torque output, case 1 amplify the force on the mass M where as the force on the Mass M in case 2 would be lower.

In this contact "constant velocity" means "constant angular velocity". So with the smaller pulley the force available to accelerate the object will be greater but the linear velocity of the belt will be lower.

Changing r is like changing gear on your car.
 
CWatters said:
In this contact "constant velocity" means "constant angular velocity". So with the smaller pulley the force available to accelerate the object will be greater but the linear velocity of the belt will be lower.

Changing r is like changing gear on your car.


but wouldn't the mass still be able to moved quicker though since for a constant T the force on the mass would be higher?


I know this is related to how if you rotate a disk from its side you apply less force but cover more distance, vice versa, but i don't know how to apply that principle in this case.
 
When you say "moved" you need to be clear if you mean "moved at a constant velocity" or "accelerated"?

If the system is frictionless and the mass is moving horizontally it takes no power (no torque) to move the mass at a constant velocity. The maximum velocity will depend on the motors angular velocity and the gearing. The radius r is part of the gearing.

If you are accelerating the mass or raising it up an incline then that's a different matter.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 63 ·
3
Replies
63
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 138 ·
5
Replies
138
Views
9K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K