Advice Needed: Last Year of College, Physics Degree, Grad School

  • Thread starter Thread starter Whowowwow
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Pursuing an undergraduate degree in Physics at 36 with plans for graduate studies in Electrical Engineering (EE) or Chemical Engineering (ChemE) is considered rational, as there are no age limits in science or engineering. However, prospective students should carefully review the admission requirements for their desired graduate programs, as many have specific undergraduate course prerequisites. Fulfilling these requirements may extend the timeline for graduation, potentially adding an extra year of study. Additionally, research experience is often a critical component for graduate school applications, and candidates should assess their qualifications in this area. For those aiming for a Ph.D., the process typically takes 5-7 years, with potential delays due to course requirements and the nature of research work, which can be unpredictable and time-consuming.
Whowowwow
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I am 36 and enrolled in my last year at a small community college. I am pursuing an undergraduate degree in Physics with an intent on studying EE or ChemE in grad school. Is that rational? or Does anyone have a better idea?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's perfectly rational if that's how you want to spend the next (approximately) decade of your life; there is no age limit on being a scientist or engineer.
 
Decade? Really??
 
take your time, everything's rational as long as you really want it. Good luck !
 
Whowowwow said:
Decade? Really??

You'll have to look at the requirements to get into your desired possibilities for graduate graduate school and see if you will meet them via your present degree program... although I'm not as familiar about EE/ChemE programs, most programs have a set of recommended undergraduate courses so that you can succeed in their core coursework (which usually takes 1-2 years); if you don't have these courses or their equivalent, you'll have to take an extra year of prerequisites to catch up, even if you are conditionally excepted.

In addition, most programs look for research experience. Do you have any applicable research or work experience?

Typically even if you are well prepared to do research, finish your core classes and qualifying exams and comprehensive exams early... if you're looking to get a Ph.D., expect it to take at least 5-7 years (WATCH OUT for it taking longer! sometimes universities have required graduation deadlines and you'll need to petition for early core courses to still count!). Often along the way you'll have to build equipment, things will break and you'll need to fix them, etc. Typically there's only about 3 times that everything is working, and that's what gives you the data to write publications and your dissertation. :smile: The only people I knew that finished in less than five years from my program were a few theorists were very good at coding computer simulations and complex calculations...
 
TL;DR Summary: What topics to cover to safely say I know arithmetic ? I am learning arithmetic from Indian NCERT textbook. Currently I have finished addition ,substraction of 2 digit numbers and divisions, multiplication of 1 digit numbers. I am moving pretty slowly. Can someone tell me what topics to cover first to build a framework and then go on in detail. I want to learn fast. It has taken me a year now learning arithmetic. I want to speed up. Thanks for the help in advance. (I also...
guys i am currently studying in computer science engineering [1st yr]. i was intrested in physics when i was in high school. due to some circumstances i chose computer science engineering degree. so i want to incoporate computer science engineering with physics and i came across computational physics. i am intrested studying it but i dont know where to start. can you guys reccomend me some yt channels or some free courses or some other way to learn the computational physics.
I'm going to make this one quick since I have little time. Background: Throughout my life I have always done good in Math. I almost always received 90%+, and received easily upwards of 95% when I took normal-level HS Math courses. When I took Grade 9 "De-Streamed" Math (All students must take "De-Streamed" in Canada), I initially had 98% until I got very sick and my mark had dropped to 95%. The Physics teachers and Math teachers talked about me as if I were some sort of genius. Then, an...

Similar threads

Back
Top