Advice On career path/ licensed engineer question

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the career path choices for a physics major interested in engineering, specifically mechanical engineering. Participants explore the implications of obtaining a dual degree versus pursuing a master's degree, as well as the importance of engineering licensure in different fields.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant is considering two educational paths: a dual degree in physics and engineering or a bachelor's in physics followed by a master's in mechanical engineering, and seeks advice on which is preferable.
  • Another participant provides a link to information about the licensure process for engineers, noting that many states require a bachelor's degree in engineering for licensure.
  • It is mentioned that the significance of being a licensed engineer varies by engineering discipline, with civil engineering placing a higher importance on licensure compared to fields like computer engineering.
  • Some participants express confusion regarding state requirements for taking the Fundamentals of Engineering (FE) exam, indicating that some states may not allow individuals without a bachelor's in engineering to sit for the exam.
  • One participant suggests that obtaining a bachelor's in engineering may be the best option for those wanting to pursue engineering, despite the additional time required.
  • Another participant clarifies that licensure is generally less critical for aerospace engineering and may not be necessary for many mechanical engineering roles, except for specific applications like HVAC system design.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the necessity of licensure for various engineering fields, indicating that there is no consensus on the importance of obtaining a licensed engineer status for all engineering careers.

Contextual Notes

There are uncertainties regarding state-specific licensure requirements and the implications of having a degree in physics versus engineering. The discussion reflects varying opinions on the relevance of licensure based on the specific engineering discipline.

Who May Find This Useful

Students considering a career in engineering, particularly those with a background in physics, and individuals seeking information on engineering licensure requirements in different states.

NBAJam100
Messages
143
Reaction score
0
I am currently a physics major in my junior year of college (I changed to physics after my first year so technically it is only my 2nd year as a physics major). I know that i want to do some sort of engineering, preferably mechanical, in the future. I have 2 choices right now:

1.) get a dual degree in physics/engineering (which would take 5.5-6 yrs due to the late start on physics). or 2.) get a bs in physics and then a masters in ME, which would also most likely take around 6 years.

My question is which seems like the best path to take? I've heard many things about people being worried that they arent "licensed engineers" if they don't get their B.S in engineering. What exactly does that entail and mean and how does it change your job options/chance of getting a job? I am in the US if that makes a difference.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
http://www.ncees.org/licensure/licensure_for_engineers/ tells the whole story about the process of becoming a licensed engineer.

From what I understand, the BS vs MS issue is that many states explicitly require a bachelor's degree in engineering, and will not license people who "only" have a master's degree.

Does it make a difference in your career? Well, that totally depends on what type of engineering you are doing. The only difference between licensed/non-licensed is that a licensed engineer can put his "stamp" on a project approving it as safe, etc. As you can imagine, this is rather important in civil engineering. In computer engineering, on the other hand, it's much less important.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Some states won't let you sit for the FE exam if you don't have a bachelor's in physics, whether you intend to pursue a PE license or not. (FE=Fundamentals of Engineering).

One of the people who sits on the state board here gave a presentation to our school, and we asked all about how to become an engineer (or licensed geologist, as that also falls under their purvey). The advice they gave was, basically, you can't, but if you want to, it's better to move to a state where they will let you take the FE exam without a bachelor's in engineering.

It was all, frankly, very confusing. So my advice is to get the bachelor's in engineering if you want to do engineering, even if it takes you extra time.
 
Engineering licensure is only important if your work involves infrastructure, such as buildings (including mechanical and electrical components), bridges, and other things that could affect public safety.

What are your professional goals?
 
Thanks for the help guys,

Kenny: My personal goals are to become with a mechanical engineer or an aerospace engineer. Would i need to be licensed for those?!
 
That's a no on aerospace engineering. For mechanical engineering, probably not, but maybe. It's only important if you want to design HVAC systems for buildings. That's only a tiny part of mechanical engineering though, so you have a lot of different options that don't require licensure.
 

Similar threads

Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K