Advice on Learning Advanced Mathematics

AI Thread Summary
To effectively learn advanced mathematics for finance independently, it's crucial to develop a strong intuitive understanding through diverse reading and perspectives. Engaging with various textbooks and resources can enhance comprehension, as different authors present concepts in unique ways. A solid foundation in probability and combinatorics is recommended, especially for those already comfortable with calculus. Books like 'Probability Through Problems' can provide practical exercises and applications to reinforce learning. Emphasizing problem-solving from multiple angles is essential for mastering mathematical concepts in finance.
Inquisitor
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
As a philosophy student, I never went beyond Calculus. Since completing my studies, I began trading equities and derivative products. I've made efforts to study the mathematical aspects of finance, but lack the preparation to really understand the subject. Some of the required mathematics, is simply way over my head.

What advice would you give to someone studying the mathematics of finance on their own? What books? Any websites? I don't plan on going back to school for additional training. Any help would be appreciated.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I'm majoring in both philosophy and maths, and I've always taken a philosophical approach to mathematics. Mathematics is a very creative subject, so having a strong intuitive understanding is important. That's why I think it's important to read a lot. Different teachers and textbooks will prove theorems and describe maths in different ways. Getting a multitude of perspectives helps you understand what is going on.

I've never studied mathematics by just going to class and then trying to do exercises and assignments purely by what the lecturer says. Often there are better ways to do things, and it's good to do some research and find out these other ways. I don't think mathematics is about having a problem and being very insular in the way you try to solve it.

I don't know much about the mathematics of finance, and I've just been rambling, but I hope that you find something worthwhile in what I've said.
 
With the caveat that I have not actually studied much financial math, I recommend that you start with some work in probability and combinatorics. If you are comfortable with calculus, you will pick it up easily enough, and I think it will come in handy as your studies focus on wherever your interests may take you.

That said, recommending a book is a much different story. The is a wide spectrum of such books, ranging from too simple to too much. I have an interesting looking book called 'Probability Through Problems', where you work out all of the important theorems and applications as excercises (solutions are given). I have not looked too deeply, but this book may be a good place to start if you intend to learn yourself.

Otherwise, just browse for a book which looks readable, and one in which the excercises look interesting (because you want to do as many of them as possible).
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top