Aerospace vs Mech Eng: What's the Difference?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rocketboy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Aerospace
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the differences between aerospace engineering (AE) and mechanical engineering (ME) undergraduate programs, particularly in Canada where only a couple of universities offer AE. Aerospace engineering focuses on specialized topics like aerodynamics, aircraft flight mechanics, and aerospace propulsion, while mechanical engineering covers a broader range of subjects, including finite element analysis and HVAC systems. The practicality of pursuing an engineering degree over a physics degree is highlighted, with a consensus that an engineering degree is generally more applicable to industry. Concerns are raised about the limited availability of aerospace programs and the potential advantages of an aerospace undergraduate degree when applying to graduate aerospace programs compared to a mechanical engineering background. The discussion emphasizes the importance of aligning educational choices with career goals and the relevance of specialization in the aerospace field.
rocketboy
Messages
243
Reaction score
1
Hey,

I was wondering what the main differences are between an aerospace eng and mech eng undergrad program. I've been looking into aerospace but there are very very few (i think 2) universities in Canada that offer it as an undergraduate study. (UofT and Carleton). So what does it offer that mech eng doesn't and vice versa?

Thanks
-Jon
 
Physics news on Phys.org
basically:

AE: in your senior year you choose AeroDynamics, Aircraft flight mechanics, Aerospace propulsion
ME: you take finite element analysis or some advanced statics class, some electives (HVAC, Internal Combustion Engine, etc).
 
Would it be more practical to get an undergrad in aerospace versus physics? I am thinking that I should do this - and afterwards go to grad school for physics. Is there really no point in this? Should I go physics for undergrad too?
 
Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering degrees are broadly the same in the UK, the latter being more general and the former (naturally) concentrating slightly more on aerodynamics and aerospace systems, and less on manufacturing and materials.

An engineering degree would definitely be more "practical" than a physics degree, but you need to ask yourself whether practicality is a real consideration in your studies. Good luck either way.
 
This may be a stupid question, however since only 2 Canadian universities offer aero eng at undergrad level, perhaps not so much. If i were to go into a graduate aerospace program after i did my undergrad, how much of an advantage would i have coming out of an aerospace eng vs coming out of mech eng. I'm sure there are many mech eng undergrad students who go into aeros grad studies...so what is the advantage to an aero undergrad?

thanks, you guys are the greatest help.
-jon
 
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
Back
Top