Air in water - effect on UV dose

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mazee
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Air Uv Water
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the impact of air bubbles in water on UV disinfection processes. A UV unit used for potable water disinfection showed turbidity readings fluctuating due to air presence, with lab measurements at ~0.2 NTU and online readings exceeding 30 NTU. The presence of air bubbles does not significantly affect UV dose or absorbance, as confirmed by the UV dose sensor readings. The consensus is that while air bubbles cause visible light refraction, their effect on UV treatment is negligible.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of UV disinfection principles
  • Familiarity with turbidity measurement techniques
  • Knowledge of UV dose sensors and their functionality
  • Basic concepts of light refraction and reflection in fluids
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the effects of turbidity on UV disinfection efficiency
  • Explore methods to minimize air bubble formation in water treatment
  • Learn about advanced UV dose monitoring technologies
  • Investigate the relationship between water turbidity and UV penetration depth
USEFUL FOR

Water treatment professionals, environmental engineers, and anyone involved in the design and operation of UV disinfection systems for potable water.

mazee
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Imagine UV unit used for disinfection of potable water. The turbidity of water is ~0.2 NTU – measured in lab. However at times the on-line analyser for the unit reads above detection limit (>30 NTU) – due to air presence – lots of small air bubbles which clear if sample is left for ~15 minutes.

I understand why the sample of this “super aerated” water appears white (visible light refraction through multiple air-water and water-air inter-phases) and why on-line turbidity instrument has spurious readings (scatter instrument).

My concern is whether the presence of these air bubbles affects UV dose and absorbance?
In my understanding UV waves would just simply change direction multiple times inside the unit but the absorbance should not be increased (or increase would be negligible) similarly the dose would not change (much).

The unit is also equipped with UV dose sensor and this did not detect any significant changes when the air was present in the water which would confirm my thinking was correct.

Any advice on the issue would be appreciated. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would prefer to have no bubbles at all.

UV penetration as water flows through the unit is calculated only through absorption from water, no reflections / refractions are taken into account when sizing and flow rating such units.
 
so are reflections/refractions not accounted for because their effect is negligible or undesired?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
10K