Air in water - effect on UV dose

  • Thread starter Thread starter mazee
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Air Uv Water
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the impact of air bubbles in water on UV disinfection processes. The presence of small air bubbles leads to misleading turbidity readings, but the UV dose sensor shows no significant changes when these bubbles are present. It is suggested that while UV waves may change direction due to the air-water interfaces, the overall absorbance and UV dose remain largely unaffected. The calculations for UV penetration typically focus on absorption rather than reflections or refractions, implying their effects are considered negligible. The participant expresses a preference for bubble-free water to ensure optimal UV disinfection.
mazee
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Imagine UV unit used for disinfection of potable water. The turbidity of water is ~0.2 NTU – measured in lab. However at times the on-line analyser for the unit reads above detection limit (>30 NTU) – due to air presence – lots of small air bubbles which clear if sample is left for ~15 minutes.

I understand why the sample of this “super aerated” water appears white (visible light refraction through multiple air-water and water-air inter-phases) and why on-line turbidity instrument has spurious readings (scatter instrument).

My concern is whether the presence of these air bubbles affects UV dose and absorbance?
In my understanding UV waves would just simply change direction multiple times inside the unit but the absorbance should not be increased (or increase would be negligible) similarly the dose would not change (much).

The unit is also equipped with UV dose sensor and this did not detect any significant changes when the air was present in the water which would confirm my thinking was correct.

Any advice on the issue would be appreciated. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would prefer to have no bubbles at all.

UV penetration as water flows through the unit is calculated only through absorption from water, no reflections / refractions are taken into account when sizing and flow rating such units.
 
so are reflections/refractions not accounted for because their effect is negligible or undesired?
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top