Air volume in the tank, volume vs pressure

AI Thread Summary
A 5-gallon air tank at 160 psi is equivalent to a 2.5-gallon tank at 320 psi when considering absolute pressures. However, pressures are often expressed as gauge pressure, which excludes atmospheric pressure. To determine how much air is available before the tank is "empty," gauge pressure should be used. Understanding the difference between absolute and gauge pressure is crucial for accurate comparisons. This distinction is important for anyone assessing air tank capacities and performance.
bad_student
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
New to forum

Most air tanks are categorized on volume of air they hold . The question I have is this that a 5 gal air tank that holds 160 psi , is it equivalent to a tank that holds 2.5 gal of air at 320 PSI ?

if not then is there a formula to figure this ratio .

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bad_student said:
New to forum
Welcome to PF!
Most air tanks are categorized on volume of air they hold . The question I have is this that a 5 gal air tank that holds 160 psi , is it equivalent to a tank that holds 2.5 gal of air at 320 PSI ?
Yes.
 
Yes, if those are absolute pressures. But pressures in tanks are often expressed as gauge pressure, which is absolute pressure minus 14.7 psi.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
If you are attempting to measure how much air will come out of the tank before it is "empty" then gauge pressure is an appropriate measure.

By "empty", I mean gauge pressure zero.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top