Albert Einstein 1911 "On the Influence of Gravity on Light

  • Thread starter Thread starter spidey
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Einstein Paper
spidey
Messages
213
Reaction score
0
can anyone give me the webpage link of this paper by Einstein

Einstein, Albert, 1911, "On the Influence of Gravity on the Propagation of Light", Annalen der Physik, 35: 898–90

I heard that in this paper Einstein tells that velocity of light is changed by gravitational field...i want to read it...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Last edited:
spidey said:
can anyone give me the webpage link of this paper by Einstein

Einstein, Albert, 1911, "On the Influence of Gravity on the Propagation of Light", Annalen der Physik, 35: 898–90

I heard that in this paper Einstein tells that velocity of light is changed by gravitational field...i want to read it...

You need to be careful, in 1911 Einstein was not done developing GR, the part that you are interested in was later corrected , so his views in the 1911 paper are no longer considered correct by today's standards.
 
Here is a book on both the Special and General Theories that Einstein wrote in 1920.

http://www.bartleby.com/173/

chapter 22 said:
In the second place our result shows that, according to the general theory of relativity, the law of the constancy of the velocity of light in vacuo, which constitutes one of the two fundamental assumptions in the special theory of relativity and to which we have already frequently referred, cannot claim any unlimited validity. A curvature of rays of light can only take place when the velocity of propagation of light varies with position. Now we might think that as a consequence of this, the special theory of relativity and with it the whole theory of relativity would be laid in the dust. But in reality this is not the case. We can only conclude that the special theory of relativity cannot claim an unlimited domain of validity; its result hold only so long as we are able to disregard the influences of gravitational fields on the phenomena (e.g. of light).
 
Thank you all...
 
Thanks this one is very useful to me
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top