futurebird
- 270
- 0
1. How many homomorphism are there of \mathbb{Z} onto \mathbb{Z}?
Answer from the book: 2
I don't know why this is the answer! Is it because the only homomorphism possible are \phi(x) = x and \phi(x) = e (where e is the identity) ?
Anything else won't work, for example: if
\phi(x)=2x
then \phi(xy) = 2xy
and \phi(x)\phi(y) = 2x2y
2xy \neq 2x2y. ?
Or should I be using additive notation because \mathbb{Z} is the set of integers?

Okay next question:
2. Let \phi: G \rightarrow G' be a group homomorphism. Show that if |G| is finite, then |\phi[G]| is finite and is a divisor of |G|.
Homomorphisms don't need to be one-to-one or onto, so I'm havinga hard time seeing why this must be true. Why can't each element in G map to an infinite number of items in G'? My book uses a diagram that suggests that this kind of mapping is like a projection to the x axis, so the set G may have two dimensions, but the set G' has only one. I don't see why this has to be the case, though ...
Answer from the book: 2
I don't know why this is the answer! Is it because the only homomorphism possible are \phi(x) = x and \phi(x) = e (where e is the identity) ?
Anything else won't work, for example: if
\phi(x)=2x
then \phi(xy) = 2xy
and \phi(x)\phi(y) = 2x2y
2xy \neq 2x2y. ?
Or should I be using additive notation because \mathbb{Z} is the set of integers?

Okay next question:
2. Let \phi: G \rightarrow G' be a group homomorphism. Show that if |G| is finite, then |\phi[G]| is finite and is a divisor of |G|.
Homomorphisms don't need to be one-to-one or onto, so I'm havinga hard time seeing why this must be true. Why can't each element in G map to an infinite number of items in G'? My book uses a diagram that suggests that this kind of mapping is like a projection to the x axis, so the set G may have two dimensions, but the set G' has only one. I don't see why this has to be the case, though ...
Last edited: