Algebraic Extensions, vector spaces

joeblow
Messages
71
Reaction score
0
Suppose that F/K is an algebraic extension, S is a subset of F with S/K a vector space and s^n \in S for all s in S. I want to show that if char(K) isn't 2, then S is a subfield of F.

Since F/K is algebraic, we know that \text{span} \lbrace 1,s,s^2,...\rbrace is a field for any s in S. Thus, I want to define E= \bigcup _{s \in S} \text{span} \lbrace 1,s,s^2,...\rbrace. Since S/K is a v.s., we have \text{span}\lbrace 1,s,s^2,...\rbrace \subseteq S and since E is just a union of subsets of S, E \subset S. Also, by the way we defined E, S \subseteq E so E = S.

(E,+) is a group by the fact that S/K is a v.s. Each nonzero element has an inverse in S since \text{span} \lbrace 1,s,s^2,...\rbrace is a field and each s belongs to one of those fileds (so that field would have the inverse of s).

The hard part seems to be proving closure of multiplication. Suppose that s_1 s_2 = s + v for s_1,s_2,s\in S and v\in F. We have already shown that S contains all inverses, so s_2 = s_1^{-1} s + s_1^{-1} v \in S. Whence, s_1^{-1} v \in S. Obviously, I want to show that v\in S, but progress has stopped at this point.

Any suggestions would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think about how you can get an expression involving s_1+s_2 and s_1s_2.
 
Since S is a v.s., we get s_1+s_2 by vector addition.

For s_1 s_2 you have to multiply two linear combos in S (whose basis must be a subset of the basis for F/K). If the product of two basis elements of S is again in S, then the product of any two elements of S would be in S.

However, I do not see how to show this.
 
I'm not sure how to phrase my hint differently, so I apologize if this is giving away too much: Consider (s_1+s_2)^2.
 
Yay. That makes sense why char(K) can't be 2 then.

Thanks a lot... why couldn't I think of that.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...

Similar threads

Back
Top