Algebraic Question: e(e*a) - e x (e x a) = 3a?

  • Thread starter Thread starter KleZMeR
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a mathematical query involving the unit vector e and the equation a = e(e*a) - e x (e x a), where the user consistently arrives at 3a instead of a. The user seeks clarification on their algebraic approach, particularly regarding the application of dot and cross products. They express uncertainty about their calculations involving determinants and vector identities, questioning if their results are correct. The conversation suggests using vector identities to simplify the problem, indicating a potential misunderstanding in the application of operations. The thread highlights the complexities of vector algebra and the importance of proper identity usage in solving such equations.
KleZMeR
Messages
125
Reaction score
0
ok, this is my first post here so i don't know what kind of questions i can ask, so i'll fire away...
e is unit vector, I'm showing a = e(e*a) - e x (e x a), where * is the dot-product and x is the cross product, i keep getting 3a, not a. Is my algebra off or?...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you show your work so we can see where you might be going wrong?
 
well that's a lot of stuff, ok i'll try, these are simple matrix operations, i think my positive/negative alternating on row operations are ok when finding det a, but still, the rhs is where the problem must be because e(e*a)=a, right?? so

a= c1x + c2y + c3z

and taking both cross products, e x (e x a), because all scalars of e = 1 i get

c1 + c2 + c3 - ((c2-c1) - (c1-c3))x = 3c1
c1 + c2 + c3 - ((c3-c2) - (c2-c1))y = 3c2
c1 + c2 + c3 - ((c1-c3) - (c3-c2))z = 3c3

so is this not =3a ??

why was this question moved? did i post it in the wrong place?
 
Use vector identities instead.

a x (b x c) = (a.c)b - (a.b)c
 
thanks
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top