Alice, Bob and Charge falling into Black Hole

Dmitry67
Messages
2,564
Reaction score
1
Alice and Bob are hovering at say 10Rs at opposite sides of the non-rotarting black hole. Bob drops charged body and it is free falling into black hole (again, at opposite side from Alice). They both measure the intensity of electromagnetc field. Initially, of course, intensity at Bobs location is much higher.

Question: do Alice and Bobs measurements become equal in finite time (as Black Hole does not have hair and it can't have any non-symemtric charge distribution), or, as for Bob and Alce object 'freezes' at the event horizon, Bob measures slightly more intensive EM field forever?

My bet is they never become equal: even body reaches the singularity and situation becomes symmetric, the change in EM field propagates from EH very slowly.

Now slightly different situation: Bob and Alice observe neutron star with non-symmetric charge distribution, where the unbalanced charge is already below future horizon. Now star suddenly collapses. I conclude that Bob and Alice wll still measure different values. Am I right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There's a good discussion of the kind of issue you're talking about in ch. 6 and 7 of Black Holes and Time Warps, by Kip Thorne.

I don't think the nonzero charge on the object really changes the answer to your question. With an uncharged object, we get all the same issues, but there is only gravitational radiation, not gravitational+EM.

The various no-hair theorems are all theorems about static solutions. They don't have anything to say about the process of collapse.

The Penrose-Hawking singularity theorems prove geodesic incompleteness, i.e., they only talk about the experience of an infalling observer, not about how the process appears from the outside.

In your example, I believe what happens is that gravitational and electromagnetic radiation very quickly remove the nonuniformity produced by the charged object that Bob drops in. Bob has only added a finite amount of mass-energy to the system, so radiation can only carry away a finite amount of energy. As the object approaches the horizon, its radiation (both electromagnetic and gravitational) becomes infinitely weak and redshifted. To a distant observer, the externally observable fields converge asymptotically to those of a static black hole.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top