Alternative examples, alternating series test

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
40 replies · 5K views
Abscissas
Messages
65
Reaction score
1
Hey guys, this one is just for funnsies. So when dealing with an alternating series test, 3 requirements must be met, :
Alternating
u(sub n) ≥ u(sub n+1) for all n ≥ N, for some integer N
u(sub n) → 0 as n → ∞.

So I have been coming up with examples where of these are true, and one isnt. A little bit further, I am not sure if this makes sense, but is possible to find an example for each where like, one diverges and one converges, or does that not make sense?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Come on, come up with some examples yourself first! It's not hard to find some counterexamples! Tell us what you've got already, and I'll help you fill in the parts you don't have.

(By the way, there are not always examples possible where one diverges and one converges. I can see one obvious condition where it wouldn't be the case).
 
Oh right! forgot about that, havnt slept in waaayy to long. Alright so i think the sum of ((-1)^2n)/n wouldn't alternate (rule 1) but seems to follow the rest, sum of cos(pi)/n I think would alternate and go to zero. I am thinking the one that your thinking of, which I've had a hunch on, is u(sub n) ≥ u(sub n+1) for all n ≥ N, for some integer N for diverging, but i can't really put it into words or make sense of it,its just a hunch , probably due to my lack of sleep
 
Well, couldn't it converge to someone other than 0?
 
also, don't forget that u (Sub n) is in absolute values, sorry forgot to put that
 
Right, if it doesn't go to zero then it diverges because of the infinite sums. forgot about that. Yeah so i guess for that one it is impossible
 
∑sin(n)/n I think would converge
 
never mind it alternates haha
 
∑Sin(npi)/n right? because it would keep going to 0s and not alternating
 
I just tried to plug it into my calculator and it denied me. My instincts tell me it doesnt. but I put down sin(3pi/4)= negative and sin(3pi/4)= still negative, and before pi its positive
 
Hang on, would ∑1/n work? because the absolute value of the next term has to be greater then the last right?
 
Ohhhh, ∑((-1)^2n)/n would work too right?
 
That makes a lot more sense, and destroys my hunch about that rule not working
 
Ohh okay, i see what you did there now. I feel dumb :p. Well hey, thanks for helping, its a lot of fun , and I feel like I am getting a better understanding of this test now. Would you like to help me further?
 
Im thinking a divergence example for the decreasing rule where both others are true, I am trying to come up with something, ill post it once i have something respectable
 
Thats a really cool one, written it would be ∑n-(n+n) but wouldn't it violate the a (sub n)→ 0. I think it would go to negative infinity right? That was a cool one though and I think to fix that you could put it over n, but nvm then it gets smaller. Oh by the way, i totally couldn't come up with anything, I am assuming this was a clue to send me in the right direction, so I am going to play around with it a little
 
So when dealing with these, should I avoid simplifying? because i got ∑-1/n but before simplification i got ∑1/n-(1/n+1/n)