Aluminium vs Copper in power lines

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the use of aluminium versus copper in power lines, focusing on their electrical conductivity, density, and cost-effectiveness. Participants explore the implications of these properties for practical applications in electrical engineering.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that while aluminium is lighter and cheaper than copper, it has lower conductivity, raising a question about how one kg of aluminium can carry twice as much electricity as one kg of copper.
  • Another participant provides specific resistivity and conductivity values for both metals, emphasizing their relationship and how they affect resistance and conductance in electrical applications.
  • There is a correction regarding the densities of copper and aluminium, with one participant asserting that copper is denser than aluminium, which is acknowledged as a copy-paste error by the original poster.
  • A participant suggests considering wires of equal length made from 1 kg of copper and 1 kg of aluminium to further analyze their performance.
  • Another participant discusses the pricing of metals, indicating that factors such as abundance and extraction ease influence costs beyond just density.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of the properties of aluminium and copper, particularly regarding conductivity and practical applications. There is no consensus on the initial question posed about the carrying capacity of the metals.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions about the relationship between mass, density, and electrical properties are not fully explored. The discussion includes corrections to earlier claims regarding the densities of the materials.

Monosandalus
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I have a question concerning the use of aluminium in power lines. I know that it's lighter than copper and thus cheaper, which is the main reason we prefer it above copper. But in fact alumunium has a lower conductivity than copper. Why is it then that one kg of aluminium can carry twice as much electricity as one kg of copper ? This seems to be contradictory to me.

Thank you :)
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Here's some information that should be useful in the process of considering the question objectively:

Resistivity, \rho_e, \mathrm{(\Omega \cdot m)}:
Copper: 1.68 \times 10^{-8}
Aluminum: 2.86 \times 10^{-8}​

Conductivity, \sigma, \mathrm{(S / m)}:
Copper: 5.96 \times 10^{7}
Aluminum: 3.50 \times 10^{7}​

Density \rho_m, \mathrm{(g/cm^3)} [Edit: corrected copy-paste error and a typo.]
Copper: 8.96
Aluminum: 2.70
By the way, resistivity and conductivity are not independent. They are merely reciprocals. \rho_e = 1/\sigma. Both resisitivity and conductivity are given in terms of spatial dimensions, such as unit cross-sectional area and unit length.

If A is the cross sectional area of the conductor, \ell is the conductor's length, then

Resistance, r = \frac{\rho_e \ell}{A}

Conductance, G = \frac{1}{r} = \frac{\sigma A}{\ell}

Mass, m = A \ell \rho_m
 
Last edited:
collinsmark said:
Density ρm,(g/cm2) \rho_m, (g/cm^2)
Copper: 2.70
Aluminum: 8.96

You got those swapped. Copper is the higher density material.

BoB
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: collinsmark
Think about two wires of equal length . One made from 1 kg of Copper and the other from 1 kg of Aluminium .
 
And the price of metals depends on many factors besides just their densities (their weights). Lead is not cheaper than silver because it is lighter (it isn't: lead is heavier than silver); it's cheaper because it is more abundant and easier to extract.
 
rbelli1 said:
You got those swapped. Copper is the higher density material.

BoB
Thanks. It was a copy-paste error. Correction made.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 72 ·
3
Replies
72
Views
21K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
8K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
10K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
7K