Are My Calculations for Gas Partial Pressures Correct?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DB
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the partial pressures of hydrogen and nitrogen gases using the ideal gas law. The initial calculations yielded incorrect values due to overcomplication, with the user arriving at H2 = 282.7 kPa and N2 = 337.3 kPa. Participants suggest a simpler method involving the mole fraction to determine partial pressures directly from the total pressure. This approach emphasizes that the total pressure can be distributed among the gases based on their respective mole fractions. The user acknowledges the advice and expresses gratitude for the clarification.
DB
Messages
501
Reaction score
0
Gas laws problem

2.44e23 molecules of Hydrogen and 3.0 molecules of Nitrogen are together exerting a pressure of 620. kPa. what is the partial pressure of each gas?
Ans:H_2 = 278 kPa, N_2 = 342 kPa

so basically the way i though of solving this was to use the ideal gas law being:

PV=nRT

i kept the temperature constant at 273 K. then i found the total amount of moles by adding the # of molecules and dividing by 6.02e23:

\frac{2.44e23+3.0e23}{6.02e23}=\sim 0.90 mol

so then i asked myself: at constant temperature, what would be the total volume these gases would occupy at 620 kPa and 0.90 mol. so i solved:

620x=0.90*8.31*273

x\sim 3.29_L

so now i took hydrogen, at constant temperature, occuping a volume of 3.29 L, how much pressure would it exert? 2.44e23 is 0.41 mol so..

3.29x=0.41*8.31*273

x\sim 282.7_{kPa}

so now by law of partial pressures 620-282.7=337.3 kPa
so my answer is:

H_2 = 282.7_{kPa}

N_2 = 337.3_{kPa}

i got it wrong, i think I am overcomplicating things, could some1 help me out?

thnx
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You didn't got it wrong. There is some round off error, because you did it the "long" way.

Try to look it over again and see if you can find an easier way. If you can't see it, let us know and we'll help out.
 
i knew i was doing too much, before i posted it i had been looking and looking for an easier way n i really feel like I am missing it, some help would be great.
 
just a reminder
i have a test monday so some help would be greatly apreciated
 
The simple way to find the partial pressure of each component is to multiply the total pressure by the mole fraction. Thus n = n_1 + n2 and so P_1 = \frac{n_1}{n} P and P_2 = \frac{n_2}{n} P. This formula can be derived using the ideal gas law applied to the gas of n_1, the gas of n_2, and finally the gas of n_1 + n_2. Each of these applications is valid because no one "sees" anyone else, everybody is ideal.

<br /> P_1 V = n_1 R T<br />

<br /> P_2 V = n_2 R T<br />

<br /> P V = (n_1 + n_2) R T<br />
 
thanks man, i see it
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top