AM transmitter from clock oscillator

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Creating a short-range AM transmitter using a 32768 Hz clock oscillator is feasible, but it requires careful consideration of the receiver specifications. The oscillator frequency is nearly 33 kHz, which is unsuitable for typical audio frequencies like 3.2 kHz. To adapt a diode detector radio for this frequency, a tuning coil inductance of approximately 100 mH and a tuning capacitance of a few hundred pF are necessary. Additionally, the use of a ferrite bar core is recommended to minimize dimensions, while adhering to local regulations regarding radio transmitter construction is crucial.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of AM transmission principles
  • Knowledge of tuning circuits and capacitors
  • Familiarity with inductance calculations for radio frequencies
  • Awareness of local regulations regarding radio transmission
NEXT STEPS
  • Research tuning coil design for radio frequencies
  • Learn about ferrite core applications in RF circuits
  • Study the legal requirements for amateur radio transmission
  • Explore alternative frequencies suitable for short-range communication
USEFUL FOR

Electronics students, hobbyists interested in radio transmission, and anyone involved in DIY electronics projects requiring minimal components.

univeruser
Messages
54
Reaction score
0
I am having to ask this from lack of electronic components in my area, so, I want to ask if it is possible to make an AM transmitter (short range) using a clock oscillator? I believe it might be possible, but as the crystal is 32768 Hz, it makes sense to ask, what kind of receiver set should I make to receive 3.2 KHz? I have attached a file of a radio circuit from scitoys.com. For this receiver, I believe the only way you can help me is by changing the specifications of the tuning capacitor and the other capacitor in the circuit.

Please help me complete this school project of mine by helping me use the minimal of components to make my transmitter from a clock's quartz oscillator and give the specs for the receiver.
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.jpg
    Untitled.jpg
    8.7 KB · Views: 510
Engineering news on Phys.org
univeruser said:
I am having to ask this from lack of electronic components in my area, so, I want to ask if it is possible to make an AM transmitter (short range) using a clock oscillator? I believe it might be possible, but as the crystal is 32768 Hz, it makes sense to ask, what kind of receiver set should I make to receive 3.2 KHz? I have attached a file of a radio circuit from scitoys.com. For this receiver, I believe the only way you can help me is by changing the specifications of the tuning capacitor and the other capacitor in the circuit.

Please help me complete this school project of mine by helping me use the minimal of components to make my transmitter from a clock's quartz oscillator and give the specs for the receiver.

If your crystal is 32768Hz, then it is nearly 33kHz, not 3.2kHz, which an audio frequency. Even 33kHz is at the low end of the range of frequencies normally used for radio. To adapt your diode detector radio to this frequency you would need a tuning coil inductance of about 100mH for a tuning capacitance of a few hundred pF. Winding this on an air core might be difficult, perhaps a ferrite bar core would help keep the dimensions down.

Unfortunately, this sort of receiver is quite insensitive. To minimise the potential for interference you should not have much transmitter power, so the range may be very short. In addition, at this frequency the wavelength is over 9km, so short wire aerials won't work very well. Actually, I doubt whether 33kHz is the most appropriate frequency for what you are trying to to. Depending on what you want to send, a frequency intended for remote control of models may be more appropriate, and less likely to lead to trouble with interference and possible legal issues.

You must respect whatever regulations apply to the construction and use of radio transmitters in your country. For a school project, this is something you must discuss with your teachers. I suspect that other forum members will have more to say on this subject.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
8K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K