Amazing new experiment proposed

  • Thread starter Brad_Ad23
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Experiment
In summary, a recent study has found that testing Einstein's theory of General Relativity 30,000 times better than the current best test can help verify predictions made by some current theories of everything. Additionally, the theory of relativity is essential for the accuracy of the Global Positioning System (GPS) as it accounts for time dilation and compensates for the Earth's rotation. Even a small error in the clocks used in GPS can result in a significant positional error.
  • #1
Brad_Ad23
502
1
http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2004/26mar_einstein.htm?list531723

This would test the predictions of GR 30,000 times better than the current best test--enough to start verifying predictions made by some of the current proposals for TOEs, in terms of descrepancies.


Note to mods: I wasn't sure where to put this, so feel free to move it wherever it may be more appropriate.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Actually a scientific use for the ISS! Will wonders never cease.
 
  • #3
Why is this:

"The Global Positioning System (GPS), for instance, wouldn't be possible without the theory of relativity."
 
  • #4
What the article is saying is that unless the time corrections predicted as being necessary by SR are preset into the orbiting clocks, the errors would be so great as to make GPS useless
 
  • #5
Ahh.. Thats freaking interesting. I wouldn't think there would be enough time difference to even notice. Obviously, I'm wrong. How big of a difference would it be?
 
  • #6
http://www.metaresearch.org/cosmology/gps-relativity.asp
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #7
Aycamo----Chen cited one of the Tom Van Flanderan articles - The Loretz-Ether types arrive at the same result as to the need to provide an offset to correct for time dilation.

Whether you are a stanch relativity advocate or prefer to treat the problem as due to motion with respect to an ether - the equations are the same. The ether types claim there is difference however when it comes to compensating for the Earth's rotation, i.e., that GPS disproves SR a la the one way Sagnac effect - the relativity boys claim its really a problem for the General theory - but in actuality - it is a classical correction that needs to be made because the receiver is moving with respect to the Earth centered reference frame - so during the time required for the satellite signal to arrive, the transmission path length has changed - this corresponds to a fraction of a usec - but light travels about 30 meters in 0.1 usec. So by way of illustration, the clocks do not have to be very far off to generate a large positional error.
 

1. What is the purpose of this experiment?

The purpose of this experiment is to test a new hypothesis or theory in order to gain new insights and further our understanding of a particular field of study.

2. How will this experiment be conducted?

This experiment will be conducted using a specific methodology and set of procedures that have been carefully designed and tested in order to ensure accurate and reliable results.

3. What are the expected outcomes of this experiment?

The expected outcomes of this experiment are the discovery of new information or data that will support or refute the proposed hypothesis, and potentially lead to further research and advancements in the field.

4. What is the significance of this experiment?

This experiment is significant because it has the potential to contribute to our knowledge and understanding of a particular topic, and may have real-world applications or implications.

5. How will the results of this experiment be evaluated?

The results of this experiment will be evaluated using statistical analysis and other methods in order to determine the validity and significance of the findings. These results will also be compared to previous research and studies in the field.

Similar threads

  • Classical Physics
Replies
16
Views
820
  • Beyond the Standard Models
2
Replies
39
Views
5K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
30
Views
7K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
1
Views
926
  • STEM Career Guidance
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Back
Top