Ambient temperature energy generation

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility of generating electricity from the heat released by a compressor in a heat pump system. Participants explore the principles of energy transfer, efficiency, and the implications of thermodynamic laws, questioning whether such a device could be constructed and if it would be economically viable.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that heat pumps create more energy than they consume by moving heat from one location to another, suggesting that the energy released from the compressor could potentially be harnessed to generate electricity.
  • Others argue that the energy extracted from the compressor cannot exceed the energy input, emphasizing that the efficiency of heat engines and heat pumps operates under opposing principles related to temperature differences.
  • One participant questions the logic of extracting energy from the compressor, noting that any energy output must equal the energy input, accounting for losses due to inefficiencies such as sound and vibrations.
  • Another participant highlights that the concept of extracting more energy than consumed contradicts the laws of thermodynamics, specifically regarding entropy, and asserts that such a device is impossible.
  • A later reply acknowledges the flaws in the initial idea, suggesting a realization of the thermodynamic limitations involved.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express disagreement regarding the feasibility of generating electricity from the heat released by a compressor, with some asserting it is impossible while others explore the theoretical implications of energy transfer. The discussion remains unresolved, with competing views on the principles of thermodynamics and energy efficiency.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference the coefficients of performance (COP) of heat pumps and heat engines, indicating that the efficiency equations must be considered to understand the limitations of energy extraction. There is an acknowledgment of the complexities involved in energy transfer and the assumptions made in the initial proposals.

beamthegreat
Messages
116
Reaction score
7
It is known that heat pumps create more energy than it consumes due to moving "heat" from one place to another. For example, if an air conditioner consumes 100 watts, the compressor will release 120 watts of heat since the heat in the room will be transferred to the compressor.

Would it then be possible to extract the energy released from the compressor to generate electricity? This doesn't violate the conservation of energy since the energy is derived from the ambient temperature (The net temperature in the atmosphere will decrease to compensate for the energy we obtain).

Is this logic flawed? Would such a device be possible and economically viable?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Would it then be possible to extract the energy released from the compressor to generate electricity?
Not more than the compressor needs. The same advantage you have for heat pumps is a disadvantage for the opposite direction.

This doesn't violate the conservation of energy
It would reduce entropy, which is against the laws of physics, too.

No, such a device is impossible. There is no loophole, it is pointless to ask "would it work if ...?".
 
mfb said:
Not more than the compressor needs. The same advantage you have for heat pumps is a disadvantage for the opposite direction.

Why wouldn't it? A normal compressor would generate the same amount of energy as it would consume. Of course, we cannot extract as much energy as it needs since the generator or heat engine cannot be 100% efficient and some energy is loss as sound, EM radiation, vibrations, etc. However, the total energy released from the system must equal the energy we put into the compressor.

Now if we used this compressor to move heat from the outside air into the machine, there would be more energy that it started with. Suppose the energy it release is 115% and is released as heat. Could we use the best technology we currently have to extracte 90% of the 115% of the energy it consume back as electricity? We would then have 3.5% energy left.

Could anyone explain how this logic is flawed?
 
beamthegreat said:
Why wouldn't it?
The efficiency of heat engines and heat pumps are opposite functions of temperature difference: a greater temperature difference increases the efficiency of the heat engine, but decreases the efficiency of the heat pump.
Now if we used this compressor to move heat from the outside air into the machine, there would be more energy that it started with. Suppose the energy it release is 115% and is released as heat. Could we use the best technology we currently have to extracte 90% of the 115% of the energy it consume back as electricity? We would then have 3.5% energy left.

Could anyone explain how this logic is flawed?
Logic explained above. For the numbers, rather than pulling them out of the air, you should plug them into the heat pump and heat engine efficiency equations. Then you'll see that you can't have a 115% COP coupled with a 90% efficiency.
 
Alright thanks. I now realized how flawed this idea is. :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
6K