Ambiguity about roots of unity in discrete Fourier transform

CantorSet
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone, I have a question on the discrete Fourier transform. I already know its a change of basis operator on C^N between the usual orthonormal basis and the "Fourier" basis, which are vectors consisting of powers of the N roots of unity.

But if i recall correctly from complex analysis, the root of a complex number is not unique. So for example, if we look at the first entry of the first Fourier basis vector, it is e^{\frac{2 \pi i }{N}}. But there are N solutions here. Which one is the actual first entry in the first Fourier basis vector?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
We do not use the usual complex analysis in the calculus of discrete Fourier transformations. Instead finite fields are used, that is we consider only one cycle on the circle and do not circulate, which makes it unique. If temporary or final results do circle, then additional information from the application is needed to determine which one.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
421
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top