American soldiers used uranium bullets

  • Thread starter Thread starter AnthreX
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Uranium
AI Thread Summary
American soldiers used depleted uranium in anti-tank ammunition due to its high density, primarily in tank and aircraft munitions rather than foot soldiers' weapons. While depleted uranium is radioactive, its radiation levels are relatively low, and the chemical properties pose more significant health risks than the radiological ones. Common misconceptions exist regarding the radioactivity of these bullets, leading to exaggerated fears. Typical infantry weapons do not utilize uranium-tipped rounds; instead, the A-10 Warthog's 30mm shells are a notable example of their use. Overall, concerns about tissue damage from these rounds are valid, but the chemical hazards are a more pressing issue.
AnthreX
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
i heard that in the war between iraq and america
the american soldiers used uranium bullets.

why is that ? is it because its very dense ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Anti Tank "bullets" are made from depleted Uranium, Yes their density is a key factor. I do not think that these are used by foot soldiers but are Tank or aircraft ammo.
 
cool..

say a i shot a uranium bullet to a tank with a rifle like ( M4 )
and would they go through ? or shatter into pieces on contact,
if they do shatter into pieces are they radioactive ?

i hope they are not shooting radioactive bullets there
it wouldn't be such a nice thing to do...
 
AnthreX said:
say a i shot a uranium bullet to a tank with a rifle like ( M4 )
and would they go through ? or shatter into pieces on contact,
if they do shatter into pieces are they radioactive ?
No, typical foot-soldier's bullets are not uranium tipped. The most common are the 30mm shells of the A-10 Warthog tank killer.

i hope they are not shooting radioactive bullets there
The bullets are radioactive, but not very much. The chemical hazards/properties are worse than the radiological ones and those are only marginally worse than lead. There is a common knee-jerk reaction of people assuming them to be highly radioactive - as if all levels of radioactivity were the same.

For more info on radiological and chemical properties/risks, see THIS thread.
 
russ_watters said:
No, typical foot-soldier's bullets are not uranium tipped. The most common are the 30mm shells of the A-10 Warthog tank killer.

The bullets are radioactive, but not very much. The chemical hazards/properties are worse than the radiological ones and those are only marginally worse than lead. There is a common knee-jerk reaction of people assuming them to be highly radioactive - as if all levels of radioactivity were the same.

For more info on radiological and chemical properties/risks, see THIS thread.

funny, I would have thought the tissue damage would be the main concern :-p
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...

Similar threads

Back
Top