Ampère's circuital law and finite conductor

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter vijender
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conductor Finite Law
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Ampère's circuital law can be applied to find the magnetic field generated by a finite current-carrying conductor, specifically when considering an infinitesimal current element. The discussion highlights that while Ampère's law is applicable, it is essential to integrate across the current's strength and length, as derived in the Biot-Savart Law for magnetostatics. The conditions for using Ampère's law, particularly the requirement that the divergence of the current density (\nabla.J) equals zero, are clarified. The relationship between Ampère's law and Biot-Savart law is emphasized, noting that Biot-Savart can be utilized without such restrictions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Ampère's Law and its application in electromagnetism
  • Familiarity with the Biot-Savart Law for calculating magnetic fields
  • Knowledge of Maxwell's Equations and their implications in electromagnetism
  • Basic calculus skills for performing integrals in electromagnetism
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and applications of the Biot-Savart Law in detail
  • Explore the implications of Maxwell's Equations in various electromagnetic scenarios
  • Learn about the conditions under which Ampère's Law is applicable
  • Practice solving problems involving magnetic fields from finite current-carrying conductors
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, electrical engineering, and anyone interested in the principles of electromagnetism and magnetic field calculations.

vijender
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Can Ampère's circuital law be used to find electric field for a finite (say length l) current carrying this conductor at a finite point away from it?
If yes, then what will be Magnetic field due to a wire extending from (0,-a/2) to (0,a/2) carrying current “I” at a point (b,0) from it, if I consider a loop (circle here) of radius b/2 perpendicular to the x-axis centered at origin?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes. You can consider a infinitesimal current element and the resulting field. Then you integrate across the strength and length of your current. This has already been derived easily by most textbooks in the form of say the Biot-Savart Law for magnetostatics.
 
No, ampere's law can't be used here. You can always change the length of the wire and get the same answer. This absolutely can't be true
The derivation of Ampere's law requires that \nabla.J=0 everywhere. On the other hand Biot-Savart can be used anytime
 
EHT said:
No, ampere's law can't be used here. You can always change the length of the wire and get the same answer. This absolutely can't be true
The derivation of Ampere's law requires that \nabla.J=0 everywhere. On the other hand Biot-Savart can be used anytime

Biot-Savart is derived from Ampere's Law. Ampere's Law does not make any conditions upon the divergence of the current. When we talk about Ampere's Law, we are talking about the Ampere's Law as it appears in Maxwell's Equations.

Thus, the OP can use Ampere's Law (along with other Maxwell Equations) to derive the Biot-Savart Law for an infinitesimal current element (moving charge with constant velocity which thus requires a non-zero divergence in the current). Then the OP can use this as the basis for his contour integral around his arbitrarily shaped current loop as he has described previously.
 
Last edited:
as in the other thread, the ampere law that I mentioned is the one without displacement current correction in it
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
709
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K