Ampere's Law: Constant Magnetic Field b/w Non-Coaxial Cylinders

  • Thread starter Thread starter Merrank
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ampere's law Law
AI Thread Summary
In the discussion on Ampere's Law regarding non-coaxial cylinders, the focus is on demonstrating that the inner cylinder (radius "a") maintains a constant magnetic field despite the presence of a steady current "I" flowing between two parallel cylinders. Utilizing Ampere's Law, the magnetic field is derived by considering a circular loop around the inner cylinder and applying the principle of superposition to account for the opposing current in the outer cylinder. The calculation involves setting up the integral form of Ampere's Law, simplifying it by recognizing the constancy of the magnetic field along the loop, and evaluating the integral to find the magnetic field expression. Ultimately, the magnetic field is shown to be directly proportional to the current density and inversely related to the radius of the loop. This analysis confirms that the inner cylinder indeed has a constant magnetic field.
Merrank
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
The question is:

Between two long parallel cylinders of radius "a" and "b" (non-coaxial) and an axal separation of "c", a steady current of "I" flows. (See attachment below) Show that the inner cylinder (radius "a") has a constant magnetic field. Use Ampere's Law. Indicate all steps clearly. [Hint: 0 = 1 + (-1)]
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
Merrank said:
The question is:

Between two long parallel cylinders of radius "a" and "b" (non-coaxial) and an axal separation of "c", a steady current of "I" flows. (See attachment below) Show that the inner cylinder (radius "a") has a constant magnetic field. Use Ampere's Law. Indicate all steps clearly. [Hint: 0 = 1 + (-1)]
You have to use the principle of superposition. Work out the field for the large cylinder having a uniform current density (ie. uniform over its cross-sectional area) using Ampere's law; then work out the field for the small cylinder with a current flowing in the opposite direction with a cross-sectional density that that is the same magnitude (but opposite in direction) to that of the larger cylinder. Superimpose the two (add the field vectors).

AM
 


To show that the inner cylinder (radius "a") has a constant magnetic field, we can use Ampere's Law, which states that the line integral of the magnetic field around a closed loop is equal to the product of the enclosed current and the permeability of free space (μ0). In this case, we will consider a circular loop around the inner cylinder (radius "a") with a radius of r and a length of L, and use Ampere's Law to calculate the magnetic field at any point on the loop.

Step 1: Setting up the equation

We start by writing Ampere's Law in integral form:

∮B⃗ ⋅ dl⃗ = μ0Ienc

Where B⃗ is the magnetic field, dl⃗ is an infinitesimal element of the closed loop, and Ienc is the enclosed current. In this case, we will be considering a circular loop, so dl⃗ can be written as rdθ, where θ is the angle between the direction of the loop and the direction of the magnetic field.

Step 2: Simplifying the equation

We can simplify the equation by noting that the magnetic field is constant along the loop, and thus can be taken outside the integral. We can also substitute the value of dl⃗ with rdθ, and rewrite the enclosed current as the current density (J) multiplied by the area of the loop (πr2).

∮B⃗ ⋅ rdθ = μ0Jπr2

Step 3: Solving for the magnetic field

We can now solve for the magnetic field (B⃗) by rearranging the equation:

B⃗ = μ0Jπr2/∮rdθ

Step 4: Evaluating the integral

To evaluate the integral, we need to determine the limits of integration. Since the loop is a circle with a radius of r, the limits of integration will be from 0 to 2π, representing a full revolution around the loop. Substituting these values into the integral, we get:

B⃗ = μ0Jπr2/∮rdθ = μ0Jπr2/2π = μ0Jr/2

Step 5: Simplifying the equation

We can further simplify the equation by noting that the current density (J) can be written as the total current (
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top