Amplitude of oscillating magnetic field

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the amplitude of oscillating electric and magnetic fields in a laser beam, using the formula N = 1/2 E0 √(ε/μ) and the known value of ε/μ as 376.7Ω. Participants seek clarification on the variable N and the correct units for ε/μ, which should be ohms, not ohm squared. The amplitude of the electric field (E0) is calculated as 877.0 V m-2, but there is uncertainty regarding how to derive the amplitude of the oscillating magnetic field. Overall, the thread emphasizes the need for precise definitions and calculations in electromagnetic field equations.
Roodles01
Messages
125
Reaction score
0
N = 1/2 E0 √(ε/μ)
so
E0 = √2*N*(ε/μ)
where the value of ε/μ is 376.7Ω

I have a similar question to this, below, regarding amplitude of an oscillating magnetic field.
Yes, I'd like the answer, but am initially stuck deciding whether the mW is milli- or mega-

Homework Equations


A laser found in supermarket checkout scanners emits light in a 1.1 mm diameter beam with a power of 1.3 mW.

Part A
What is the amplitude of the oscillating electric field in the laser beam?
Express your answer to two significant figures and include the appropriate units.
=

Part B
What is the amplitude of the oscillating magnetic field in the laser beam?
Express your answer to two significant figures and include the appropriate units



Part A
N = 1/2 E0 √(ε/μ)
so
E0 = √2*N*(ε/μ)
where the value of ε/μ is 376.7Ω
E0 = √2*103*376.7Ω
= 877.0 V m-2

Not sure how to find the amplitude of the oscillating magnetic field though.

Any help gratefully received.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure what N is supposed to mean? Also you've written: "where the value of ε/μ is 376.7Ω" But that should have units of ohm squared.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top