Amusement Park Ride - Angular Speed

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 9K views
FAJISTE
Messages
57
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In an amusement park rocket ride, cars are suspended from L = 4.37-m cables attached to rotating arms at a distance of d = 6.09 m from the axis of rotation. The cables swing out at an angle of θ = 53.9° when the ride is operating. What is the angular speed of rotation?

a3cop0.gif


Homework Equations



(mv^2)/r = mg
wr(angular speed) = v

The Attempt at a Solution



Okay, so first I calculated the total radius which was 6.09 m + (sin53.9)(4.37) and got a radius of 9.62 m. Then, since there is no normal force, the tension is equal to mg, thus making mv^2/r = mg. Masses cancel out and I got v^2/r = g I got a velocity of 9.7145 m/s. Using the angular speed equation : wr = v. For angular speed I got 1.01 deg / sec. Computer says this is wrong, what did I do wrong?
 
on Phys.org
the tension is equal to mg, thus making mv^2/r = mg
Errors here! You must separate the vertical forces from the horizontal ones.
The tension is partly vertical and partly horizontal, so you'll need sine and cosine.
Write two separate equations for the horizontal and vertical forces.
I expect you will have two unknowns to find with your two equations, though you are probably only interested in one of them.
 
I only have one try left, and I'm almost positive that I use the velocity of the x component which utilizes the equation : v^2/r = tan53.9(g)

Is that correct?

I got angular speed of 1.18 deg/s which appears to still be wrong...sigh what am I doing wrong now?
 
v^2/r = tan53.9(g) looks pretty good, though I have no idea how you could get it without separating the vertical and horizontal forces.

It is 1.18 radians/s for the angular velocity.
 
Okay, I guess I'll have to ask my teach about it because 1.18 radians/s is wrong :(
 
Thanks for the help though!