An athlete executing a long jump leaves the ground at a 29.5

  • Thread starter Thread starter Superstar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ground Jump
AI Thread Summary
An athlete executing a long jump at a 29.5-degree angle travels 7.69 meters, prompting questions about takeoff speed and the impact of a 4% speed increase on jump length. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the equations of motion, specifically SUVAT, to analyze horizontal and vertical components of the jump. Participants suggest that resolving velocity into its components is crucial for solving the problem. Resources like Wikipedia and physics insights are recommended for further clarification on the concepts. A solid grasp of these principles is essential for accurately determining the jump parameters.
Superstar
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An athlete executing a long jump leaves the ground at a 29.5∘ angle and travels 7.69m . A- What was the take off speed? B- If this speed were increased by just 4.0%, how much longer would the jump be?

Homework Equations

- Unfortunately I'm totally stuck and I'm not sure what equations to use for this[/B]

The Attempt at a Solution

- I can't come to any solution because I don't really understand where to begin with this problem..[/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What you know is:
  • In the jump phase, the only force is g which pulls the athlete down
  • The start angle tells you which part of the take off speed goes upward
  • ... and which part goes forward
  • When the height above ground is 0 (again), the athlete lands
  • And you are supposed to know the formula for distance given speed and accelration
 
G**gle SUVAT.
 
I'm sorry, but I have no idea what that means. I just started Physics for the first time a few days ago, and am having a very hard time
 
Superstar said:
I'm sorry, but I have no idea what that means. I just started Physics for the first time a few days ago, and am having a very hard time
Well, if you had searched the net for SUVAT, as I suggested, you might well have found this, for example: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equations_of_motion.
Searching for suvat in that page would bring you to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equations_of_motion#Uniform_acceleration.
However, that reference is not quite ideal because it fails to point out that you can solve a problem such as yours by analysing horizontal and vertical motion separately. That is, you apply the 1-dimensional equations ("collinear" there) in the horizontal and vertical directions separately. To do this, you have to know how to resolve a velocity into its horizontal and vertical components.
There are lots of other hits for SUVAT. See which you find the most intelligible. This will be much more efficient than people on this forum trying to teach it to you. But, if there's any specific statements in them you need to have more explanation on, I'll see what I can do.
You might also find this useful, once you have the basics: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/frequently-made-errors-mechanics-kinematics/
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top