Interested in Quantum Mechanics? Check out 'The Quantum Challenge'!

  • Thread starter Thread starter jtbell
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book Interesting
jtbell
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
16,023
Reaction score
7,619
I just received in the mail an unsolicited examination copy of The Quantum Challenge: Modern Research on the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (2nd ed.), by George Greenstein and Arthur Zajonc (Jones and Bartlett, 2006 :bugeye: ).

I haven't had a chance to do more than skim through it yet, but already I'm very impressed. I think this book would be very appropriate for anyone interested in topics like Bell's Theorem, evidence for existence of photons, Schrödinger's cat and the "measurement problem." Despite the forbidding title, it's actually written at an advanced-undergraduate level, as an introduction to these issues. It's not very heavy on equations, and the text is well-written and easy to read, although understanding this stuff takes some work and mind-stretching if you're a newcomer to this area, of course!

[added] If you search for this on amazon.com, beware that the main listing is for the first edition from 1997. I eventually found that they , by following a link in the "other editions" section.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
jtbell said:
I just received in the mail an unsolicited examination copy of The Quantum Challenge: Modern Research on the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (2nd ed.), by George Greenstein and Arthur Zajonc (Jones and Bartlett, 2006 :bugeye: ).

I haven't had a chance to do more than skim through it yet, but already I'm very impressed. I think this book would be very appropriate for anyone interested in topics like Bell's Theorem, evidence for existence of photons, Schrödinger's cat and the "measurement problem." Despite the forbidding title, it's actually written at an advanced-undergraduate level, as an introduction to these issues. It's not very heavy on equations, and the text is well-written and easy to read, although understanding this stuff takes some work and mind-stretching if you're a newcomer to this area, of course!

[added] If you search for this on amazon.com, beware that the main listing is for the first edition from 1997. I eventually found that they , by following a link in the "other editions" section.

I read the first edition about three years ago. Lots of good references, pretty good discussions of the issues involved. Zajonc also wrote at least one other book -- "Chasing the Light", or something like that.

I'm curious to see if there are any significant changes in the second edition.
----------
Edit: Couldn't tell about any changes from Amazon.com listing. Maybe I missed something. Another good book that one might consider using in conjunction with this one is "The Meaning of Quantum Theory" by Jim Baggott.

These books are sort of expensive via Amazon. But, I'll bet that a reasonable price can be found by searching, and they're well worth the effort, imo. (I got lucky and found them real cheap at a local used book store a few years ago.)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In her YouTube video Bell’s Theorem Experiments on Entangled Photons, Dr. Fugate shows how polarization-entangled photons violate Bell’s inequality. In this Insight, I will use quantum information theory to explain why such entangled photon-polarization qubits violate the version of Bell’s inequality due to John Clauser, Michael Horne, Abner Shimony, and Richard Holt known as the...
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I am not sure if this falls under classical physics or quantum physics or somewhere else (so feel free to put it in the right section), but is there any micro state of the universe one can think of which if evolved under the current laws of nature, inevitably results in outcomes such as a table levitating? That example is just a random one I decided to choose but I'm really asking about any event that would seem like a "miracle" to the ordinary person (i.e. any event that doesn't seem to...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
681
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
7K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
5K
Back
Top