ANAL 618: Standardizing a Sodium Solution

  • Thread starter Thread starter asimon2008
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sodium
AI Thread Summary
To determine the molarity of the NaOH solution used to titrate 1.390 g of KHP, the initial and final buret readings are noted as 0.73 mL and 22.38 mL, respectively. The volume of NaOH used in the titration is calculated to be 21.65 mL. The molar mass of KHP is essential for calculating the moles of KHP, which is then used to find the molarity of the NaOH solution. The formula for molarity, defined as moles per liter, is applied to derive the final concentration. Accurate calculation of these values is crucial for standardizing the sodium solution effectively.
asimon2008
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A student performing this experiment titrates 1.390 g of KHP with an NaOH solution. The initial buret reading is 0.73 mL and the final buret reading is 22.38 mL. What is the molarity of the NaOH solution?


Homework Equations



Molarity= moles/Liters

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
You also need to know the formula weight of KHP (Potassium Hydrogen Phthalate). You must in some way be able to use the moles of KHP.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top