I Analog to Biot-Savart for E field

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding the analog to the Biot-Savart law for the electric field, as mentioned in Griffiths' "Introduction to Electrodynamics." Participants suggest using Gauss's law and Maxwell's equations to derive the electric field expression. They discuss the application of vector identities and integration techniques to manipulate the equations effectively. A key point raised is the relationship between Faraday's Law and Ampère's law, which can help in establishing the analogous equation for the electric field. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the underlying principles of electromagnetism to prove the desired relationship.
scoomer
Messages
18
Reaction score
4
On page 317 of "INTRODUCTION TO ELECTRODYNAMICS" 4th Ed. by Griffiths he states without proof that the analog to Biot-Savart for finding the E field is:

Electromagnetic Induction.JPG


Can anyone direct me to a reference where this is proved or give me a hint how to prove it? Thank you.
 

Attachments

  • Electromagnetic Induction.JPG
    Electromagnetic Induction.JPG
    3.9 KB · Views: 1,001
Physics news on Phys.org
Hope it can help you :wink:
IMG_20180527_105150.jpg
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20180527_105150.jpg
    IMG_20180527_105150.jpg
    30.3 KB · Views: 779
##\nabla \cdot E=\frac{1}{\epsilon}\rho##
Gauss's law ##E=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon}\int \frac{(\nabla \cdot E) \hat r}{r^2} d \tau##
Use the identity ##A \times (B \times C) = B (A \cdot C)-C(A\cdot B)## where ##A=\nabla##, and possibly integrate by parts, I am not sure,
You get an an integral like ##\frac{1}{4\pi}\int \frac{(\nabla \times E) \times \hat r}{r^2} d\tau##.
Use Maxwell's equation ##\nabla \times E = -\frac {\partial B}{\partial t}##.
This gives you ##E=-\frac {1}{4\pi} \int \frac {(\frac {\partial B}{\partial t}) \times \hat r}{r^2} d\tau##
Since you are integrating over space and not time, we can move the partial derivative out of the integral, getting
##E=-\frac {1}{4\pi} \frac{\partial}{\partial t} \int \frac { B \times \hat r}{r^2} d\tau##
I hope this helps.
 
scoomer said:
On page 317 of "INTRODUCTION TO ELECTRODYNAMICS" 4th Ed. by Griffiths
I don't have the 4th edition. In the 3rd edition, your equation appears as part of Problem 7.47:
Use the analogy between Faraday's Law and Ampère's law, together with the Biot-Savart law, to show that <<your equation>> for Faraday-induced electric fields.
So if you assume the validity of Biot-Savart, you can start from there and use the similarity between Faraday and Ampère to suss out the analogous equation for ##\vec E##. Or you can look for a derivation of Biot-Savart from Maxwell's equations, and then adapt that to work for ##\vec E## instead of ##\vec B##, again using the similarities between the various Maxwell equations.
 
  • Like
Likes scoomer and BvU
Thanks to Nguyen Son, Gene Naden and jtbell. Your responses are very helpful and much appreciated.
 
Gene Naden said:
##\nabla \cdot E=\frac{1}{\epsilon}\rho##
Gauss's law ##E=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon}\int \frac{(\nabla \cdot E) \hat r}{r^2} d \tau##
Use the identity ##A \times (B \times C) = B (A \cdot C)-C(A\cdot B)## where ##A=\nabla##, and possibly integrate by parts, I am not sure,
You get an an integral like ##\frac{1}{4\pi}\int \frac{(\nabla \times E) \times \hat r}{r^2} d\tau##.
Use Maxwell's equation ##\nabla \times E = -\frac {\partial B}{\partial t}##.
This gives you ##E=-\frac {1}{4\pi} \int \frac {(\frac {\partial B}{\partial t}) \times \hat r}{r^2} d\tau##
Since you are integrating over space and not time, we can move the partial derivative out of the integral, getting
##E=-\frac {1}{4\pi} \frac{\partial}{\partial t} \int \frac { B \times \hat r}{r^2} d\tau##
I hope this helps.
I think so ##E=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon}\int \frac{(\nabla \cdot E) \hat r}{r^2} d \tau##

Reference: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/analog-to-biot-savart-for-e-field.948269/ equation will give you 0 as induced electric fields have 0 curl so this eq is not valid here
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
Back
Top