Analysis of current flow and EM fields in seawater?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The flow of electricity through seawater differs significantly from that through metal conductors due to the ionic nature of charge carriers. While electric fields generated by point source electrodes do decay rapidly in seawater, the complexity of ionic currents and the high dielectric constant of water complicate the analysis. Direct current (DC) can be effectively transmitted through seawater, as evidenced by underwater high-voltage direct current (HVDC) systems like the Baltic Cable connecting Germany and Sweden. Alternating current (AC) is less feasible due to high impedance in seawater.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electrochemistry principles
  • Knowledge of dielectric constants and their implications
  • Familiarity with direct current (DC) and alternating current (AC) transmission
  • Basic concepts of electric field patterns and decay
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of electrochemistry in liquid conductors
  • Study the effects of dielectric constants on electric field behavior
  • Examine the design and operation of underwater HVDC transmission systems
  • Explore the differences between DC and AC transmission in various mediums
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, physicists, and professionals involved in underwater power transmission systems will benefit from this discussion, particularly those interested in the behavior of electric currents in ionic solutions like seawater.

vwrobc
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi, I have a few queries regarding the flow of electric current through (sea)water...

In general, can the flow of electricity through seawater be treated the same as through a metal conductor?

I am wondering whether the fact that it is ions rather than electrons that carry the charge has any affect?

If a current flows between two point source electrodes, what would the field patterns look like? I'm assuming the field strengths decay exponentially (as per skin effect) in the plane perpendicular to the direction of current flow. Is this correct?

Thanks for any guidance you can offer!
Rob
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The quick answer would be yes and no.

The flow of electricity in matter isn't a simple thing - even in conductors there are complicated things going on. When you add in the tendency of liquids to slosh around and the complication of the ionic currents that could form, it tends towards chaotic.

From the point of view of Physics, it isn't a terribly interesting question. (Complicated, chaotic systems are just not worth bothering with - they give no insight into the basic mechanisms behind phenomena.)

To an Engineer, it might well be, but then you would have to be very specific about which liquid and under what conditions.
 
It's similar in some ways and dissimilar in others, you have to be a bit specific. The fields definitely decay rapidly - water has a high dielectric constant.

There's no limit to how deep you can delve into this question, since we're talking about the whole field of electrochemistry basically. Direct current or alternating current? With alternating current you end up with a very high impedance, so it's not really feasible to lead commercial power lines through seawater.

But it is for DC, and there's a good number of underwater HVDC transmission systems that lead the return current through the water, meaning you only need one submarine cable. (for instance the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baltic_Cable" connecting Germany and Sweden)
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K