Analysis Question, I posted yesterday

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math_Geek
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Analysis
Math_Geek
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Analysis Question, I posted yesterday!

1. Homework Statement
Define f(x)=2x, x is rational and x+3 when x is irrational. Find all points where g(x) is continuous and prove continuity at these points


2. Homework Equations
From analysis homework and using the real definition of continuity


3. The Attempt at a Solution
what I did was I took the limit as x approached 3 of x+3, and found for 0<|x+3|<epsilon which will equal delta, then |X+3-6|=|x-3| which is less than epsilon. So then I know that the limit of the function =the limit of f(3) so therefore continuous at x=3. Is there anymore that I need?
Thanks,
Michelle
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Math_Geek said:
1. Homework Statement
Define f(x)=2x, x is rational and x+3 when x is irrational. Find all points where g(x) is continuous and prove continuity at these points


2. Homework Equations
From analysis homework and using the real definition of continuity


3. The Attempt at a Solution
what I did was I took the limit as x approached 3 of x+3, and found for 0<|x+3|<epsilon which will equal delta, then |X+3-6|=|x-3| which is less than epsilon. So then I know that the limit of the function =the limit of f(3) so therefore continuous at x=3. Is there anymore that I need?
Thanks,
Michelle
Any more? What you've done is not correct because the function you are dealing with is not x+3! You say nothing about why you are interested in
x= 3; could it possibly be because you have decided the function is only continuous at x= 3? It would have been a good idea to start by saying that and saying why you think that. As long as x is irrational and |x-3|&lt; \epsilon then |f(x)- 6|= |x+3-6|= |x-3|&lt; \epsilon. If x is rational then |f(x)- 6|= |2x- 6|= 2|x-3|. In order to make that less than \epsilon how small must |x-3| be? How can you make sure both of those are true.

And what about if x is not equal to 3? If f were continuous at x= a then the limit would be f(a). That, in turn, would mean that the limit of any sequence {f(xn)}, where xn converges to a, would have to be f(a). Suppose xn were a sequence of rational numbers converging to a- what would {f(xn)} converge to? Suppose xn were a sequence of irrational numbers converging to a- what would {f(xn)} converge to? What does that tell you?
 
Both of these lines will intersect at the point (3,6), and you would have to make epsilon= e/2 to satisfy both functions when x is either rational or irrational.
 
Math_Geek said:
what I did was I took the limit as x approached 3 of x+3, and found for 0<|x+3|<epsilon which will equal delta, then |X+3-6|=|x-3| which is less than epsilon. So then I know that the limit of the function =the limit of f(3) so therefore continuous at x=3. Is there anymore that I need?

Hi Michelle! :smile:

This very unclear …

For a start, you meant 0<|x-3|<epsilon.

And I know you meant "in this case we can choose our delta equal to epsilon", but there are better ways of saying that.
Math_Geek said:
Both of these lines will intersect at the point (3,6), and you would have to make epsilon= e/2 to satisfy both functions when x is either rational or irrational.

hmm … a bit late …

Try writing it out, all in one go, and clearly! :smile:
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top