Analytic function, creation and annihilation operators proof

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving a relationship involving an analytic function and creation and annihilation operators in quantum mechanics, specifically the expression f(a†a)a† = a†f(a†a + 1). The context is rooted in the properties of these operators and their commutation relations.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of the commutation relation [a, a†] = 1 and consider the nature of analytic functions as power series. There is discussion about using induction and the structure of the series generated by the operators.

Discussion Status

Some participants express understanding of the series expansion and how the left and right sides of the equation might relate. Others are questioning how to apply the initial result to a related problem involving the Bose-Einstein distribution, indicating a productive exploration of connections between the two topics.

Contextual Notes

One participant notes the challenge of applying the result from the first part to the grand canonical density matrix, highlighting potential gaps in the information or assumptions needed for a complete understanding.

vst98
Messages
49
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Show that

f(aa)a = af(aa + 1)

Where f is any analytic function and a and a† satisfy commutation relation [a, a] = 1.

The Attempt at a Solution


I have used [a, a†] = aa†-a†a=1 to write the expression like

f(a†a)a†= a†f(aa†)

but I don't know what to do next.

I know that analytic function can be written like f(x)=Ʃ kn(x-x0)2 and that it is infinitely differentiable, but I don't see how can I sucesssfuly
apply this, or there some other trick here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So f is essentially a power series and you can then use induction for an arbitrary power of (a+ a)
 
I think now I understand,
so on the left hand side for f(a†a) I will have powers of a†a
like a†a + a†aa†a ...
and on the right hand side for f(aa†) i will have powers of aa†
like aa† + aa†aa† ...

but since I have to multiply these series by a† from the opposite sides
(a†a + a†aa†a ... ) /a† = a†aa† + a†aa†aa† ...
a†\ ( aa† + aa†aa† ... ) = a†aa† + a†aa†aa† ...

they turn out to be the same, right ?
 
also I have a question which builds on this one (so I will stay in this thread),
A bosonic one level system can be described by the Hamiltonian
H= εa†a,

The expectation value of n = a†a is defined as n(ε) = <n> = tr(ρa†a) where

ρ=(1/ZG)*Exp[-β(ε-μ)a†a] , tr(ρ)=1

is the grand canonical density matrix.
Use f(a†a)a† = a†f(a†a + 1) to show that the form

n(ε) = 1/(Exp[β(ε-μ)]

of the Bose-Einstein distribution directly follows from the bosonic commutation
relation for a and a†.

I don't see where to apply my result from the first part, to trace function maybe ?
But that does not have appropriate form.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
854
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K