Analytic Functions Cauchy & Riemann Equations

  • Thread starter thomas49th
  • Start date
  • #1
thomas49th
655
0
Hi, this is fairly fundamental and basic, but I cannot seem to make sense of it

I know z = x + iy

and hence a function of this variable would be in the form h = f(z). BUT I do not understand why

f(z) = u(x,y) + iv(x,y)

why so? in z = x + iy, x is the real part and iy is the imaginary part, so why does y have influence in real part and x have influence in the imaginary part in f(z)?

Thanks
Thomas
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
I like Serena
Homework Helper
MHB
16,346
250
Hi thomas49th! :smile:

Consider for instance f(z)=z2.
What is (x+iy)2?
 
  • #3
36,468
8,438
Mod note: Moved from Precalculus section.
 
  • #4
kru_
85
0
I had a bit of trouble grasping this when first exposed to it, as well. What convinced me was to see f(z) as just another complex number, w. And w has its own real and imaginary part, u + iv.

Now if w = f(z) then we can say that w is (the result of) a function of z, and likewise that u and v are functions of z. So w(z) = u(z) + iv(z). But since the value of z is dependent of the values of its real and imaginary parts, x and y, we can think of w(z) = w(z(x,y)) = u(z(x,y)) + iv(z(x,y)). But there is no need for such ugly notation, since the root idea is that w is a function of both x and y. So we simplify to f(z) = w(x,y) = u(x,y) + iv(x,y).
 
  • #5
thomas49th
655
0
@ I like... thought someone might say that :)

@ kru_ that has satisfied me for the time being

all is good for now

Thanks :)
 

Suggested for: Analytic Functions Cauchy & Riemann Equations

Replies
19
Views
518
  • Last Post
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
588
Replies
2
Views
452
Replies
1
Views
270
Replies
7
Views
316
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
408
Replies
3
Views
909
  • Last Post
Replies
14
Views
1K
Top